BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a transition period from childhood to adulthood that is often characterized by emotional instability. This period is also a time of increased incidence of anxiety and depression, underscoring the importance of understanding biological substrates of behavioral and emotion regulation during adolescence. Developmental changes in the brain in concert with individual predispositions for anxiety might underlie the increased risk for poor outcomes reported during adolescence. We tested the hypothesis that difficulties in regulating behavior in emotional contexts in adolescents might be due to competition between heightened activity in subcortical emotional processing systems and immature top-down prefrontal systems. Individual differences in emotional reactivity might put some teens at greater risk during this sensitive transition in development. METHODS: We examined the association between emotion regulation and frontoamygdala circuitry in 60 children, adolescents, and adults with an emotional go-nogo paradigm. We went beyond examining the magnitude of neural activity and focused on neural adaptation within this circuitry across time with functional magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Adolescents showed exaggerated amygdala activity relative to children and adults. This age-related difference decreased with repeated exposures to the stimuli, and individual differences in self-ratings of anxiety predicted the extent of adaptation or habituation in amygdala. Individuals with higher trait anxiety showed less habituation over repeated exposures. This failure to habituate was associated with less functional connectivity between ventral prefrontal cortex and amygdala. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that exaggerated emotional reactivity during adolescence might increase the need for top-down control and put individuals with less control at greater risk for poor outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a transition period from childhood to adulthood that is often characterized by emotional instability. This period is also a time of increased incidence of anxiety and depression, underscoring the importance of understanding biological substrates of behavioral and emotion regulation during adolescence. Developmental changes in the brain in concert with individual predispositions for anxiety might underlie the increased risk for poor outcomes reported during adolescence. We tested the hypothesis that difficulties in regulating behavior in emotional contexts in adolescents might be due to competition between heightened activity in subcortical emotional processing systems and immature top-down prefrontal systems. Individual differences in emotional reactivity might put some teens at greater risk during this sensitive transition in development. METHODS: We examined the association between emotion regulation and frontoamygdala circuitry in 60 children, adolescents, and adults with an emotional go-nogo paradigm. We went beyond examining the magnitude of neural activity and focused on neural adaptation within this circuitry across time with functional magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Adolescents showed exaggerated amygdala activity relative to children and adults. This age-related difference decreased with repeated exposures to the stimuli, and individual differences in self-ratings of anxiety predicted the extent of adaptation or habituation in amygdala. Individuals with higher trait anxiety showed less habituation over repeated exposures. This failure to habituate was associated with less functional connectivity between ventral prefrontal cortex and amygdala. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that exaggerated emotional reactivity during adolescence might increase the need for top-down control and put individuals with less control at greater risk for poor outcomes.
Authors: Danice K Eaton; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; James Ross; Joseph Hawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Shari Shanklin; Connie Lim; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Howell Wechsler Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Erin B McClure; Christopher S Monk; Eric E Nelson; Jessica M Parrish; Abby Adler; R James R Blair; Stephen Fromm; Dennis S Charney; Ellen Leibenluft; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2007-01
Authors: Lukas Pezawas; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Emily M Drabant; Beth A Verchinski; Karen E Munoz; Bhaskar S Kolachana; Michael F Egan; Venkata S Mattay; Ahmad R Hariri; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2005-05-08 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Shmuel Lissek; Alice S Powers; Erin B McClure; Elizabeth A Phelps; Girma Woldehawariat; Christian Grillon; Daniel S Pine Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2005-11
Authors: William E Moore; Jennifer H Pfeifer; Carrie L Masten; John C Mazziotta; Marco Iacoboni; Mirella Dapretto Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Kateri McRae; James J Gross; Jochen Weber; Elaine R Robertson; Peter Sokol-Hessner; Rebecca D Ray; John D E Gabrieli; Kevin N Ochsner Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Victoria L Cressman; Jordan Balaban; Sara Steinfeld; Alexei Shemyakin; Peter Graham; Nelly Parisot; Holly Moore Journal: J Comp Neurol Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 3.215
Authors: Nicholas F Wymbs; Catherine Orr; Matthew D Albaugh; Robert R Althoff; Kerry O'Loughlin; Hannah Holbrook; Hugh Garavan; Janitza L Montalvo-Ortiz; Stewart Mostofsky; James Hudziak; Joan Kaufman Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2020-02-14