Literature DB >> 28082214

Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan.

John A Harris1, Anne G Sammarco2, Carolyn W Swenson2, Shitanshu Uppal2, Neil Kamdar2, Darrel Campbell3, Sarah Evilsizer4, John O DeLancey2, Daniel M Morgan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare teams that frequently follow a bundle of evidence-based processes provide care with lower rates of morbidity. Few process bundles to improve surgical outcomes in hysterectomy have been identified.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a bundle of 4 perioperative care processes is associated with fewer postoperative complications and readmissions for hysterectomies in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. STUDY
DESIGN: A bundle of perioperative care process goals was developed retrospectively with 30-day peri- and postoperative outcome data from the Hysterectomy Initiative in Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. All benign hysterectomies that had been performed between January 2013 and January 2015 were included. Based on evidence of lower complication rates after benign hysterectomy, the following processes were considered to be the "bundle": use of guideline-appropriate preoperative antibiotics, a minimally invasive surgical approach, operative duration <120 minutes, and avoidance of intraoperative hemostatic agent use. Each process was considered present or absent, and the number of processes was summed for a bundle score that ranged from 0-4. Cases with a score of zero were excluded. Outcomes measured were rates of complications (any and major) and hospital readmissions, all within 30 days of surgery. Postoperative events that were considered a "major complication" included acute renal failure, cardiac arrest that required cardiopulmonary resuscitation, central line infection, cerebral vascular accident, death, deep vein thrombosis, intestinal obstruction, myocardial infarction, pelvic abscess, pulmonary embolism, rectovaginal fistula, sepsis, surgical site infection (deep and organ-space), unplanned intubation, ureteral obstruction, and ureterovaginal and vesicovaginal fistula. The outcome "any complication" included all those events already described in addition to blood transfusion within 72 hours of surgery, urinary tract infection, and superficial surgical site infection. Outcomes were adjusted for patient demographics, surgical factors, and hospital-level clustering effects.
RESULTS: There were 16,286 benign hysterectomies available for analysis. Among all hysterectomies that were reviewed, 33.6% met criteria for all bundle processes; however, there was wide variation in the rate among the 56 hospitals in the study sample with 9.1% of cases at the lowest quartile and 60.4% at the highest quartile of hospitals that met criteria for all bundle processes. Overall, the rate of any complication was 6.8% and of any major complication was 2.3%. The rate of hospital readmissions was 3.6%. After adjustment for confounders, in cases in which all bundle criterion were met compared with cases in which all bundle criterion were not met, the rate of any complications increased from 4.3-7.8% (P<.001); major complications increased from 1.7-2.6% (P<.001), and readmissions increased from 2.6-4.1% (P<.001). After adjustment for confounders, hospitals with greater rates of meeting all 4 criteria were associated significantly with lower hospital-level rates of postoperative complications (P<.001) and readmissions (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This multiinstitutional evaluation reveals that reduced morbidity and readmission are associated with rates of bundle compliance. The proposed bundle is a surgical goal, which is not possible in every case, and there is significant variation in the proportion of cases meeting all 4 bundle processes in Michigan hospitals. Implementation of evidence-based process bundles at a healthcare system level are worthy of prospective study to determine whether improvements in patient outcomes are possible.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bundle; hysterectomy; morbidity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28082214      PMCID: PMC5420470          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  24 in total

1.  Development and implementation results of an interactive computerized surgical checklist for robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Michele L McCarroll; Melissa D Zullo; G Dante Roulette; Thomas M Mendise; Edward Ferris; Jessica Zolton; Stephen J Andrews; Vivian E von Gruenigen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-09-12

2.  ACOG practice bulletin No. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Using Bundled Interventions to Reduce Surgical Site Infection After Major Gynecologic Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Megan P Johnson; Sharon J Kim; Carrie L Langstraat; Sneha Jain; Elizabeth B Habermann; Jean E Wentink; Pamela L Grubbs; Sharon A Nehring; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Robert R Cima; Sean C Dowdy; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Risk of postoperative pelvic abscess in major gynecologic oncology surgery: one-year single-institution experience.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Barbara Costantini; Francesco Fanfani; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Cristiano Rossitto; Antonella Lecca; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.

Authors:  C Ottosen; G Lingman; L Ottosen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Use of other treatments before hysterectomy for benign conditions in a statewide hospital collaborative.

Authors:  Lauren E Corona; Carolyn W Swenson; Kyle H Sheetz; Gwendolyn Shelby; Mitchell B Berger; Mark D Pearlman; Darrell A Campbell; John O DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Prophylactic Antibiotic Choice and Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Shitanshu Uppal; John Harris; Ahmed Al-Niaimi; Carolyn W Swenson; Mark D Pearlman; R Kevin Reynolds; Neil Kamdar; Ali Bazzi; Darrell A Campbell; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Elizabeth Curr; Ray Garry; Sabine van Voorst; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Surgical site infection reduction bundle in patients with gynecologic cancer undergoing colon surgery.

Authors:  Maria B Schiavone; Lea Moukarzel; Kam Leong; Qin C Zhou; Anoushka M Afonso; Alexia Iasonos; Kara Long Roche; Mario M Leitao; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Systematic Review of Topical Hemostatic Agent Use in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Traci E Ito; Alexandra L Martin; Edith F Henderson; Jeremy T Gaskins; Vida M Vaughn; Shan M Biscette; Resad P Pasic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Ultrasound-guided Needle Biopsy for Preoperative Assessment of Uterine Fibroids: Our Experience and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Carlo Alboni; Ludovica Camacho Mattos; Stefania Malmusi; Maria Cristina Galassi; Fabio Facchinetti; Mohamed Mabrouk
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-02-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.