Literature DB >> 19588344

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Theodoor E Nieboer1, Neil Johnson, Anne Lethaby, Emma Tavender, Elizabeth Curr, Ray Garry, Sabine van Voorst, Ben Willem J Mol, Kirsten B Kluivers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The three approaches to hysterectomy for benign disease are abdominal hysterectomy (AH), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). Laparoscopic hysterectomy has three further subdivisions depending on the part of the procedure performed laparoscopically.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the most beneficial and least harmful surgical approach to hysterectomy for women with benign gynaecological conditions. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials (15 August 2008), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2008), EMBASE (1980 to August 2008), Biological Abstracts (1969 to August 2008), the National Research Register, and relevant citation lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials comparing one surgical approach to hysterectomy with another were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Independent selection of trials and data extraction were employed following Cochrane guidelines. MAIN
RESULTS: There were 34 included studies with 4495 women. The benefits of VH versus AH were speedier return to normal activities (mean difference (MD) 9.5 days), fewer febrile episodes or unspecified infections (odds ratio (OR) 0.42), and shorter duration of hospital stay (MD 1.1 days). The benefits of LH versus AH were speedier return to normal activities (MD 13.6 days), lower intraoperative blood loss (MD 45 cc), a smaller drop in haemoglobin (MD 0.55 g/dl), shorter hospital stay (MD 2.0 days), and fewer wound or abdominal wall infections (OR 0.31) at the cost of more urinary tract (bladder or ureter) injuries (OR 2.41) and longer operation time (MD 20.3 minutes). The benefits of LAVH versus TLH were fewer febrile episodes or unspecified infection (OR 3.77) and shorter operation time (MD 25.3 minutes). There was no evidence of benefits of LH versus VH and the operation time (MD 39.3 minutes) as well as substantial bleeding (OR 2.76) were increased in LH. For some important outcomes, the analyses were underpowered to detect important differences or they were simply not reported in trials. Data were absent for many important long-term outcome measures. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Because of equal or significantly better outcomes on all parameters, VH should be performed in preference to AH where possible. Where VH is not possible, LH may avoid the need for AH however the length of the surgery increases as the extent of the surgery performed laparoscopically increases. The surgical approach to hysterectomy should be decided by the woman in discussion with her surgeon in light of the relative benefits and hazards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19588344     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  170 in total

1.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery is applicable to most gynecologic surgery: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Maria Lee; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Ga Won Yim; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Eva van der Meij; Mark Hans Emanuel
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-12

Review 3.  Vaginal Hysterectomy: The Present Past.

Authors:  Dionysios K Veronikis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

4.  Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan.

Authors:  John A Harris; Anne G Sammarco; Carolyn W Swenson; Shitanshu Uppal; Neil Kamdar; Darrel Campbell; Sarah Evilsizer; John O DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Iatrogenic ureteral injury in colorectal cancer surgery: a nationwide study comparing laparoscopic and open approaches.

Authors:  Peter Andersen; Lars Maagaard Andersen; Lene H Iversen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Tilman Witte; Alena N Tofte; Jeremy Chou; Jonathan D Black; Vrunda B Desai; Elisabeth A Erekson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 7.  Medical Device Safety and Surgical Dissemination of Unrecognized Uterine Malignancy: Morcellation in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Tracilyn Hall; Susanna I Lee; David M Boruta; Annekathryn Goodman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-09-17

8.  Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

Authors:  K J Neis; W Zubke; T Römer; K Schwerdtfeger; T Schollmeyer; S Rimbach; B Holthaus; E Solomayer; B Bojahr; F Neis; C Reisenauer; B Gabriel; H Dieterich; I B Runnenbaum; W Kleine; A Strauss; M Menton; I Mylonas; M David; L-C Horn; D Schmidt; P Gaß; A T Teichmann; P Brandner; W Stummvoll; A Kuhn; M Müller; M Fehr; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Tissue injuries after single-port and multiport laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries: A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Kyeong A So; Jae Kwan Lee; Jae Yun Song; Jae Won Kim; Nak Woo Lee; Kyung-Do Ki; Jong-Min Lee; Yong Jung Song; Yong Jin Na; Chun Hoe Ku; Jin Woo Shin; Chul Jung Kim; Un Suk Jung
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Routes of hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease in the Vancouver Coastal Health and Providence Health Care regions: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Sarka Lisonkova; Catherine Allaire; Christina Williams; Paul Yong; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.