Sarunas Tarasevicius1, Alfredas Smailys2, Kazimieras Grigaitis2, Otto Robertsson3, Justinas Stucinskas2. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania. sarunas.tarasevicius@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopedics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate how the use of dual-mobility cups (DMCs) affected the risk of revision due to dislocation as well as overall risk of revision compared with a conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) system in the short term. METHODS: A total of 12,657 primary THAs were registered from the start of 2011 to the end of 2014. 620 THAs were with DMCs. For comparison, we included all registered THAs with Exeter cup and a cemented Exeter stem combined with 28-mm femoral head. Patients were followed up with respect to revision and/or death until 1 January 2016. For survival analysis, we used revision as an endpoint. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the influence of various covariates (age, gender, surgical approach, THA model and pre-operative diagnosis). RESULTS: Of the 620 dual-mobility THAs and 2170 Exeter THAs, 100 had been revised. The overall unadjusted cumulative revision rate (CRR) for any reason of revision at five years after surgery was 3.9% in the dual-mobility group and 5.2% in the Exeter group. Cox regression analysis, adjusting for age, gender, THA type, surgical approach and pre-operative diagnosis, showed that the risk of revision was less in patients operated with DMCs and in patients having their operation for osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: The DM implant had a lower short-term complication rate than a conventional well defined THA. Low dislocation rate suggests that it is a good choice for high risk patients.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate how the use of dual-mobility cups (DMCs) affected the risk of revision due to dislocation as well as overall risk of revision compared with a conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) system in the short term. METHODS: A total of 12,657 primary THAs were registered from the start of 2011 to the end of 2014. 620 THAs were with DMCs. For comparison, we included all registered THAs with Exeter cup and a cemented Exeter stem combined with 28-mm femoral head. Patients were followed up with respect to revision and/or death until 1 January 2016. For survival analysis, we used revision as an endpoint. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the influence of various covariates (age, gender, surgical approach, THA model and pre-operative diagnosis). RESULTS: Of the 620 dual-mobility THAs and 2170 Exeter THAs, 100 had been revised. The overall unadjusted cumulative revision rate (CRR) for any reason of revision at five years after surgery was 3.9% in the dual-mobility group and 5.2% in the Exeter group. Cox regression analysis, adjusting for age, gender, THA type, surgical approach and pre-operative diagnosis, showed that the risk of revision was less in patients operated with DMCs and in patients having their operation for osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: The DM implant had a lower short-term complication rate than a conventional well defined THA. Low dislocation rate suggests that it is a good choice for high risk patients.
Authors: R Philippot; F Farizon; J-P Camilleri; B Boyer; G Derhi; J Bonnan; M-H Fessy; F Lecuire Journal: Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot Date: 2008-07-25
Authors: Antoine Combes; Henri Migaud; Julien Girard; Alain Duhamel; Michel Henri Fessy Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Alain Cypres; Arnaud Fiquet; Philippe Girardin; David Fitch; Philippe Bauchu; Olivier Bonnard; Daniel Noyer; Christophe Roy Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 2.359
Authors: Loes W A H Van Beers; Bart C H Van Der Wal; Tess Glastra Van Loon; Dirk Jan F Moojen; Marieke F Van Wier; Amanda D Klaassen; Nienke W Willigenburg; Rudolf W Poolman Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 3.717