Literature DB >> 28076721

Effect of Tumor Complexity and Technique on Efficacy and Complications after Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Stage T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.

Marki E Klapperich1, E Jason Abel1, Timothy J Ziemlewicz1, Sara Best1, Meghan G Lubner1, Stephen Y Nakada1, J Louis Hinshaw1, Christopher L Brace1, Fred T Lee1, Shane A Wells1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the effects of tumor complexity and technique on early and midterm oncologic efficacy and rate of complications for 100 consecutive biopsy-proved stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) treated with percutaneous microwave ablation. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant, single-center retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Ninety-six consecutive patients (68 men, 28 women; mean age, 66 years ± 9.4) with 100 stage T1a N0M0 biopsy-proved RCCs (median diameter, 2.6 cm ± 0.8) underwent percutaneous microwave ablation between March 2011 and June 2015. Patient and procedural data were collected, including body mass index, comorbidities, tumor histologic characteristics and grade, RENAL nephrometry score, number of antennas, generator power, and duration of ablation. Technical success, local tumor progression, and presence of complications were assessed at immediate and follow-up imaging. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Results Technical success was achieved for all 100 tumors (100%), including 47 moderately and five highly complex RCCs. Median clinical and imaging follow-up was 17 months (range, 0-48 months) and 15 months (range, 0-44 months), respectively. No change in estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted after the procedure (P = .49). There were three (3%) procedure-related complications and six (6%) delayed complications, all urinomas. One case of local tumor progression (1%) was identified 25 months after the procedure. Three-year local progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 88% (95% confidence interval: 0.52%, 0.97%), 100% (95% confidence interval: 1.0%, 1.0%), and 91% (95% confidence interval: 0.51%, 0.99%), respectively. Conclusion Percutaneous microwave ablation is an effective and safe treatment option for stage T1a RCC, regardless of tumor complexity. Long-term follow-up is needed to establish durable oncologic efficacy and survival relative to competing ablation modalities and surgery. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28076721      PMCID: PMC5495130          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous ablation in the kidney.

Authors:  Aradhana M Venkatesan; Bradford J Wood; Debra A Gervais
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of renal function detriments after local tumor ablation or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Larcher; Malek Meskawi; Roger Valdivieso; Katharina Boehm; Vincent Trudeau; Zhe Tian; Nicola Fossati; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Giovanni Lughezzani; Nicolò Buffi; Maxine Sun; Pierre Karakiewicz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  High-powered microwave ablation of t1a renal cell carcinoma: safety and initial clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Anna J Moreland; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara L Best; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Marci L Alexander; Christopher L Brace; Douglas R Kitchin; Sean P Hedican; Stephen Y Nakada; Fred T Lee; E Jason Abel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Percutaneous biopsy for risk stratification of renal masses.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; Anna Drewry; Edwin Jason Abel
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-10

5.  Use of hydrodissection to prevent nerve and muscular damage during radiofrequency ablation of kidney tumors.

Authors:  S Justin Lee; Lynda T Choyke; Julia K Locklin; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Multiple-Antenna Microwave Ablation: Spatially Distributing Power Improves Thermal Profiles and Reduces Invasiveness.

Authors:  Paul F Laeseke; Fred T Lee; Daniel W van der Weide; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  J Interv Oncol       Date:  2009

7.  High-powered gas-cooled microwave ablation: shaft cooling creates an effective stick function without altering the ablation zone.

Authors:  Erica M Knavel; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Anita Andreano; Thomas F Warner; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  R.E.N.A.L. (Radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score predicts early tumor recurrence and complications after percutaneous ablative therapies for renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year experience.

Authors:  Juan C Camacho; Nima Kokabi; Minzhi Xing; Viraj A Master; John G Pattaras; Pardeep K Mittal; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Percutaneous cryoablation of large renal masses: technical feasibility and short-term outcome.

Authors:  Thomas D Atwell; Michael A Farrell; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Bradley C Leibovich; Igor Frank; David E Patterson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Management of renal tumors by image-guided radiofrequency ablation: experience in 105 tumors.

Authors:  David J Breen; Elizabeth E Rutherford; Brian Stedman; Shuvro H Roy-Choudhury; James E I Cast; Matthew C Hayes; Christopher J Smart
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  17 in total

1.  Robotically-Assisted Sonic Therapy for Renal Ablation in a Live Porcine Model: Initial Preclinical Results.

Authors:  Emily A Knott; John F Swietlik; Katherine C Longo; Rao F Watson; Chelsey M Green; E Jason Abel; Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Amanda R Smolock; Zhen Xu; Fred T Lee; Timothy J Ziemlewicz
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Outcomes of Microwave Ablation for Small Renal Masses: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Courtney Yong; Sarah L Mott; Sandeep Laroia; Chad R Tracy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence for the Management of T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: What IRs Need to Know for Kidney Cancer Tumor Boards.

Authors:  Julie Cronan; Sean Dariushnia; Zachary Bercu; Robert Mitchell Ermentrout; Bill Majdalany; Laura Findeiss; Janice Newsome; Nima Kokabi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Safety and efficacy of RFA versus MWA for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Brigit M Aarts; Fernando M Gomez; Marta Lopez-Yurda; Rob F M Bevers; Joris Herndriks; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Axel Bex; Elisabeth G Klompenhouwer; Rutger W van der Meer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 5.  Imaging considerations for thermal and radiotherapy ablation of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mohammad Haroon; Paul Sathiadoss; Rebecca M Hibbert; Satheesh Krishna Jeyaraj; Christopher Lim; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-07-10

6.  Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Histologically Proven T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  B M Aarts; W Prevoo; M A J Meier; A Bex; R G H Beets-Tan; E G Klompenhouwer; F M Gómez
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Exploiting Tissue Dielectric Properties to Shape Microwave Thermal Ablation Zones.

Authors:  Anna Bottiglieri; Giuseppe Ruvio; Martin O'Halloran; Laura Farina
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Focal therapy versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the management of clinical T1 renal masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Young Eun Yoon; Hyung Ho Lee; Ki Hong Kim; Sung Yul Park; Hong Sang Moon; Seung Ryeol Lee; Young Kwon Hong; Dong Soo Park; Dae Keun Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  MR-Guided Microwave Ablation in T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Initial Results in Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Zhaonan Li; De-Chao Jiao; Chaoyan Wang; Wenguang Zhang; Jing Li; Xinwei Han
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  A multicenter 10-year oncologic outcome of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: will it stand the test of time?

Authors:  Jie Yu; Hui Wang; Zhi-Gang Cheng; Fang-Yi Liu; Qin-Ying Li; Guang-Zhi He; Yan-Chun Luo; Xiao-Ling Yu; Zhi-Yu Han; Ping Liang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.