BACKGROUND: Microwave ablation is an emerging tumor ablation modality. To date, microwave systems have generally utilized single large-diameter antennas to deliver high input powers. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether spatially distributing power through an array of multiple smaller antennas creates a more uniform thermal profile and increases peripheral tissue temperatures when compared with microwave ablation using a single larger antenna. METHODS: Microwave ablations were performed in ex vivo bovine liver using a single 2.45-GHz magnetron generator and a constant total input power (90 W) delivered through either a single 13-gauge antenna, two 17-gauge antennas, or three 18-gauge antennas. Multiple antennas were driven coherently. Temperatures were recorded at 5-mm radial distances and the resulting thermal profiles and ablation zones were compared using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Multiple-antenna configurations were less invasive (ie, the area of tissue punctured was smaller) than the single-antenna configuration; despite this, ablation zones created using multiple smaller antennas were larger and as circular when compared with those created using a single larger antenna. Multiple-antenna configurations resulted in more uniform thermal profiles and higher peripheral tissue temperatures. CONCLUSION: Distributing power evenly among multiple smaller antennas resulted in larger ablation zones with more uniform thermal profiles than more invasive ablations with a larger single antenna.
BACKGROUND: Microwave ablation is an emerging tumor ablation modality. To date, microwave systems have generally utilized single large-diameter antennas to deliver high input powers. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether spatially distributing power through an array of multiple smaller antennas creates a more uniform thermal profile and increases peripheral tissue temperatures when compared with microwave ablation using a single larger antenna. METHODS: Microwave ablations were performed in ex vivo bovine liver using a single 2.45-GHz magnetron generator and a constant total input power (90 W) delivered through either a single 13-gauge antenna, two 17-gauge antennas, or three 18-gauge antennas. Multiple antennas were driven coherently. Temperatures were recorded at 5-mm radial distances and the resulting thermal profiles and ablation zones were compared using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Multiple-antenna configurations were less invasive (ie, the area of tissue punctured was smaller) than the single-antenna configuration; despite this, ablation zones created using multiple smaller antennas were larger and as circular when compared with those created using a single larger antenna. Multiple-antenna configurations resulted in more uniform thermal profiles and higher peripheral tissue temperatures. CONCLUSION: Distributing power evenly among multiple smaller antennas resulted in larger ablation zones with more uniform thermal profiles than more invasive ablations with a larger single antenna.
Authors: Christopher L Brace; Paul F Laeseke; Lisa A Sampson; Tina M Frey; Daniel W van der Weide; Fred T Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: S N Goldberg; P F Hahn; K K Tanabe; P R Mueller; W Schima; C A Athanasoulis; C C Compton; L Solbiati; G S Gazelle Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 1998 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: S B Chinn; F T Lee; G D Kennedy; C Chinn; C D Johnson; T C Winter; T F Warner; D M Mahvi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Martin G Mack; Ralf Straub; Katrin Eichler; Oliver Söllner; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christopher L Brace; Paul F Laeseke; Daniel W van der Weide; Fred T Lee Journal: IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Paul F Laeseke; Tina M Frey; Chris L Brace; Lisa A Sampson; Thomas C Winter; Jan R Ketzler; Fred T Lee Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Colin M Harari; Michelle Magagna; Mariajose Bedoya; Fred T Lee; Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Timothy Ziemlewicz; Christopher L Brace Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marki E Klapperich; E Jason Abel; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara Best; Meghan G Lubner; Stephen Y Nakada; J Louis Hinshaw; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee; Shane A Wells Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Theodora A Potretzke; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Shane A Wells; Christopher L Brace; Parul Agarwal; Fred T Lee Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Chiara Floridi; Irene De Bernardi; Federico Fontana; Alessandra Muollo; Anna Maria Ierardi; Andrea Agostini; Paolo Fonio; Ettore Squillaci; Luca Brunese; Carlo Fugazzola; Gianpaolo Carrafiello Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace Journal: Radiographics Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.333