Juan C Camacho1, Nima Kokabi2, Minzhi Xing3, Viraj A Master4, John G Pattaras4, Pardeep K Mittal5, Hyun S Kim6. 1. Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Division of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Presbyterian South Tower, Suite 3950, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3553. 4. Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Division of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Presbyterian South Tower, Suite 3950, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3553.; Department of Radiology, and Interventional Oncology Translational Laboratory, Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Presbyterian South Tower, Suite 3950, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3553.. Electronic address: kimk7@upmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score after percutaneous ablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective 5-year study was performed. Participants were 87 consecutive patients (median age, 67.1 y; 59.7% male, 40.3% female) with 101 biopsy-proven RCCs who underwent percutaneous ablation (54.0% cryoablation, 46.0% radiofrequency ablation). Follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all cases (mean follow-up, 34.6 mo ± 23.5). R.E.N.A.L. scores were analyzed to determine the association of the score with treatment outcomes and complications. RESULTS: All tumors corresponded to stage 1A disease. Mean tumor size was 2.05 cm (range, 0.7-3.9 cm), and 50.5% of the lesions measured > 2 cm. Nephrometry score was > 8 in 31.4% of lesions. Overall recurrence rate was 16.8%, first-year recurrence rate was 7.9%, and complication rate was 9.9%. A nephrometry score > 8 was associated with increased complications after percutaneous ablation (P < .0001), increased overall recurrence (P < .0001), and increased risk of first-year recurrence (P < .0001). Immediate complications were associated with tumor size > 2 cm (P < .0001) and risk of local recurrence (P < .001). Age, gender, and percutaneous ablation technique were not correlated with recurrence or immediate complications. Patients undergoing cryoablation had a higher nephrometry score with no significant differences in recurrence rate compared with RF ablation (P = .199). CONCLUSIONS: A R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥ 8 predicts recurrence and complications after percutaneous renal ablation.
PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score after percutaneous ablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective 5-year study was performed. Participants were 87 consecutive patients (median age, 67.1 y; 59.7% male, 40.3% female) with 101 biopsy-proven RCCs who underwent percutaneous ablation (54.0% cryoablation, 46.0% radiofrequency ablation). Follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all cases (mean follow-up, 34.6 mo ± 23.5). R.E.N.A.L. scores were analyzed to determine the association of the score with treatment outcomes and complications. RESULTS: All tumors corresponded to stage 1A disease. Mean tumor size was 2.05 cm (range, 0.7-3.9 cm), and 50.5% of the lesions measured > 2 cm. Nephrometry score was > 8 in 31.4% of lesions. Overall recurrence rate was 16.8%, first-year recurrence rate was 7.9%, and complication rate was 9.9%. A nephrometry score > 8 was associated with increased complications after percutaneous ablation (P < .0001), increased overall recurrence (P < .0001), and increased risk of first-year recurrence (P < .0001). Immediate complications were associated with tumor size > 2 cm (P < .0001) and risk of local recurrence (P < .001). Age, gender, and percutaneous ablation technique were not correlated with recurrence or immediate complications. Patients undergoing cryoablation had a higher nephrometry score with no significant differences in recurrence rate compared with RF ablation (P = .199). CONCLUSIONS: A R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥ 8 predicts recurrence and complications after percutaneous renal ablation.
Authors: Marki E Klapperich; E Jason Abel; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara Best; Meghan G Lubner; Stephen Y Nakada; J Louis Hinshaw; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee; Shane A Wells Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Simone L Vernez; Zhamshid Okhunov; Kamaljot Kaler; Ramy F Youssef; Rahul Dutta; Arkadiy Palvanov; Paras Shah; Kathryn Osann; David N Siegel; Igor Lobko; Louis Kavoussi; Ralph V Clayman; Jaime Landman Journal: Urology Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: J J Wendler; B Friebe; D Baumunk; A Blana; T Franiel; R Ganzer; B Hadaschik; T Henkel; K U Köhrmann; J Köllermann; T Kuru; S Machtens; A Roosen; G Salomon; H P Schlemmer; L Sentker; U Witzsch; U B Liehr; J Ricke; M Schostak Journal: Urologe A Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: O Rodriguez Faba; F Sanguedolce; P Grange; G Kooiman; A Bakavicius; P De la Torre; J Palou Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Laura A Bertrand; Lewis J Thomas; Peng Li; Claire M Buchta; Shannon K Boi; Rachael M Orlandella; James A Brown; Kenneth G Nepple; Lyse A Norian Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 3.498