OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to validate the ability of a new gas-cooled microwave device to secure antennas into tissue before ablation via shaft cooling and to verify that such cooling does not compromise the intended ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The force required to extract several types of applicators from ex vivo bovine liver before and after ablation was measured. Six groups were compared: cooled needle and multitined radiofrequency electrodes, secured and unsecured cryoprobes, and gas-cooled microwave antennas (n = 6 each). Ablations were next created in in vivo porcine livers for 2 and 10 minutes (n = 6 each) using the gas-cooled microwave system at 140 W. Extraction force was again measured before and after ablation and compared between groups using analysis of variance with post hoc Student t tests. Histologic analysis of the ablation zone was performed to evaluate cellular necrosis along the antenna shaft. RESULTS: Ex vivo, the secured cryoprobe and microwave antenna required significantly more force to remove than unsecured radiofrequency, cryoprobe, and microwave applicators (p < 0.05, all comparisons). The multitined radiofrequency electrode and cooled radiofrequency electrode required significantly more force to remove after ablation than before ablation (p = 0.006 and 0.02, respectively). In vivo, the secured antenna required significantly more force to remove before ablation than after ablation at both 2 (p < 0.0001) and 10 minutes (p < 0.0001). There was no histologic evidence of cell preservation along the antenna shaft. CONCLUSION: The gas cooling used in this microwave device can effectively secure antennas into tissue without altering ablation shape or reducing the intended thermal damage.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to validate the ability of a new gas-cooled microwave device to secure antennas into tissue before ablation via shaft cooling and to verify that such cooling does not compromise the intended ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The force required to extract several types of applicators from ex vivo bovine liver before and after ablation was measured. Six groups were compared: cooled needle and multitined radiofrequency electrodes, secured and unsecured cryoprobes, and gas-cooled microwave antennas (n = 6 each). Ablations were next created in in vivo porcine livers for 2 and 10 minutes (n = 6 each) using the gas-cooled microwave system at 140 W. Extraction force was again measured before and after ablation and compared between groups using analysis of variance with post hoc Student t tests. Histologic analysis of the ablation zone was performed to evaluate cellular necrosis along the antenna shaft. RESULTS: Ex vivo, the secured cryoprobe and microwave antenna required significantly more force to remove than unsecured radiofrequency, cryoprobe, and microwave applicators (p < 0.05, all comparisons). The multitined radiofrequency electrode and cooled radiofrequency electrode required significantly more force to remove after ablation than before ablation (p = 0.006 and 0.02, respectively). In vivo, the secured antenna required significantly more force to remove before ablation than after ablation at both 2 (p < 0.0001) and 10 minutes (p < 0.0001). There was no histologic evidence of cell preservation along the antenna shaft. CONCLUSION: The gas cooling used in this microwave device can effectively secure antennas into tissue without altering ablation shape or reducing the intended thermal damage.
Authors: Christopher L Brace; Paul F Laeseke; Lisa A Sampson; Tina M Frey; Daniel W van der Weide; Fred T Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ming Kuang; Ming D Lu; Xiao Y Xie; Hui X Xu; Li Q Mo; Guang J Liu; Zuo F Xu; Yan L Zheng; Jin Y Liang Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: T Seki; M Wakabayashi; T Nakagawa; T Itho; T Shiro; K Kunieda; M Sato; S Uchiyama; K Inoue Journal: Cancer Date: 1994-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Christopher L Brace; Paul F Laeseke; Daniel W van der Weide; Fred T Lee Journal: IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Hernan I Vargas; William C Dooley; Robert A Gardner; Katherine D Gonzalez; Rose Venegas; Sylvia H Heywang-Kobrunner; Alan J Fenn Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Marki E Klapperich; E Jason Abel; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara Best; Meghan G Lubner; Stephen Y Nakada; J Louis Hinshaw; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee; Shane A Wells Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace Journal: Radiographics Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.333