Literature DB >> 26425141

Percutaneous biopsy for risk stratification of renal masses.

Michael L Blute1, Anna Drewry1, Edwin Jason Abel2.   

Abstract

The increased use of abdominal imaging has led to identification of more patients with incidental renal masses, and renal mass biopsy (RMB) has become a popular method to evaluate unknown renal masses prior to definitive treatment. Pathologic data obtained from biopsy may be used to guide decisions for treatment and may include the presence or absence of malignant tumor, renal cell cancer subtype, tumor grade and the presence of other aggressive pathologic features. However, prior to using RMB for risk stratification, it is important to understand whether RMB findings are equivalent to pathologic analysis of surgical specimens and to identify any potential limitations of this approach. This review outlines the advantages and limitations of the current studies that evaluate RMB as a guide for treatment decision in patients with unknown renal masses. In multiple series, RMB has demonstrated low morbidity and a theoretical reduction in cost, if patients with benign tumors are identified from biopsy and can avoid subsequent treatment. However, when considering the routine use of RMB for risk stratification, it is important to note that biopsy may underestimate risk in some patients by undergrading, understaging or failing to identify aggressive tumor features. Future studies should focus on developing treatment algorithms that integrate RMB to identify the optimal use in risk stratification of patients with unknown renal masses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  renal cell carcinoma; renal mass biopsy; risk stratification; small renal mass

Year:  2015        PMID: 26425141      PMCID: PMC4549697          DOI: 10.1177/1756287215585273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  67 in total

1.  Renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidental renal tumors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Debra A Gervais; Rebecca I Hartman; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Adam S Feldman; Peter R Mueller; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew Evans; Hannah Chung; Daniel A Shiff; Kimberly Fernandes; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography for renal sinus fat invasion in renal cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Cherry Kim; Hyuck Jae Choi; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Trends in the use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Che-Kai Tsao; Alexander C Small; Erin L Moshier; Benjamin A Gartrell; Juan P Wisnivesky; Guru Sonpavde; James H Godbold; Michael A Palese; Simon J Hall; William K Oh; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Grade heterogeneity in small renal masses: potential implications for renal mass biopsy.

Authors:  Mark W Ball; Stephania M Bezerra; Michael A Gorin; Morgan Cowan; Christian P Pavlovich; Phillip M Pierorazio; George J Netto; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses.

Authors:  Beverley A Shannon; Ronald J Cohen; Hildemarie de Bruto; Robert J Davies
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Contemporary results of percutaneous biopsy of 100 small renal masses: a single center experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Volpe; Kamal Mattar; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew J Evans; William R Geddie; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Outcomes and predictors of clinical T1 to pathological T3a tumor up-staging after robotic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Gorin; Mark W Ball; Phillip M Pierorazio; Youssef S Tanagho; Sam B Bhayani; Jihad H Kaouk; Craig G Rogers; Michael D Stifelman; Ali Khalifeh; Ramesh Kumar; Ganesh Sivarajan; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Surena F Matin; Mihir M Desai; Jihad H Kaouk; Andrew Steinberg; Ed Mascha; Julie Thornton; Mahmoud H Sherief; Brenda Strzempkowski; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of Tumor Complexity and Technique on Efficacy and Complications after Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Stage T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Marki E Klapperich; E Jason Abel; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara Best; Meghan G Lubner; Stephen Y Nakada; J Louis Hinshaw; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee; Shane A Wells
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The evolving role of renal mass biopsy.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; E Jason Abel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-02

3.  Shape and texture-based radiomics signature on CT effectively discriminates benign from malignant renal masses.

Authors:  Felix Y Yap; Bino A Varghese; Steven Y Cen; Darryl H Hwang; Xiaomeng Lei; Bhushan Desai; Christopher Lau; Lindsay L Yang; Austin J Fullenkamp; Simin Hajian; Marielena Rivas; Megha Nayyar Gupta; Brian D Quinn; Manju Aron; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Assad A Oberai; Inderbir S Gill; Vinay A Duddalwar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The kidney cancer research priority-setting partnership: Identifying the top 10 research priorities as defined by patients, caregivers, and expert clinicians.

Authors:  Jennifer Jones; Jaimin Bhatt; Jonathan Avery; Andreas Laupacis; Katherine Cowan; Naveen Basappa; Joan Basiuk; Christina Canil; Sohaib Al-Asaaed; Daniel Heng; Lori Wood; Dawn Stacey; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Imaging guided percutaneous renal biopsy: do it or not?

Authors:  Francesco Pagnini; Eleonora Cervi; Umberto Maestroni; Andrea Agostini; Alessandra Borgheresi; Filippo Piacentino; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Anna Maria Ierardi; Chiara Floridi; Mattia Carbone; Francesco Ziglioli; Massimo De Filippo
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-07-13

6.  Identification of aberrant tRNA-halves expression patterns in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Malin Nientiedt; Mario Deng; Doris Schmidt; Sven Perner; Stefan C Müller; Jörg Ellinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma using a three-gene promoter methylation panel.

Authors:  Ana Sílvia Pires-Luís; Pedro Costa-Pinheiro; Maria João Ferreira; Luís Antunes; Francisco Lobo; Jorge Oliveira; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Tumor Seeding With Renal Cell Carcinoma After Renal Biopsy.

Authors:  M F B Andersen; T P Norus
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2016-09-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.