| Literature DB >> 28068418 |
Jéssica Bórquez1, Antonio Brante1.
Abstract
Studying the mating system of obligate aquatic organisms that inhabit river ecosystems is important for understanding its evolution as well as the role of biological and environmental factors in modulating population dynamics and species distributional patterns. Here, we studied the reproductive strategy of the Chilean endemic freshwater snail, Chilina dombeiana, in the Biobío River, one of the largest rivers in Chile. This species has a low potential for dispersal given the absence of a free-swimming larval stage (benthic larval development) and given that adults have a low capacity for mobility. We hypothesized that: 1. Females would mate with different males (polyandry) resulting in intrabrood multiple paternity, 2. Individuals from closer sites would be more related than individuals from distant sites, and 3. Male parental contributions would be unevenly distributed within broods. Individuals from three different sites were sampled along the river: upper, mid, and river mouth. In the laboratory, hatching juveniles from a total of 15 broods were collected for paternity analyses. We used microsatellite markers and the programs GERUD and COLONY to determine whether multiple paternity exists and to estimate the contribution of different males to the brood. We found that multiple paternity was very common at all of the sites analyzed with as many as 8 males fertilizing a single female and a mean of 4.2 fathers per brood estimated by COLONY. Sire contribution was skewed to particular males in several broods. In addition, overall relatedness among broods for the three sites ranged from 0.17 to 0.45 with evidence of many half-siblings. Relatedness differed among the three sites. Particularly in upstream sites or in anthropogenically disturbed populations, the high levels of multiple paternity observed in C. dombeiana may be an efficient strategy to avoid inbreeding and prevent the loss of genetic diversity within populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28068418 PMCID: PMC5221823 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary statistics of genetic variability for three sites along the Biobío River: Upper Biobío (UBB), Mid Biobío (MBB), and mouth of the river (MoBB).
| Sites | AR | He | Ho | P(0.95) | P(0.99) | FIS | HWE | s(g2) | Pg2 = 0 | s(ML) | CI(95) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBB | 4.90 | 0.557 | 0.52 | 0.909 | 0.909 | 0.092 | 0.120 | 0.018 | 0.449 | 0 | [0, 0.148] |
| MBB | 5.90 | 0.490 | 0.46 | 0.909 | 1 | 0.089 | 0.229 | 0 | 0.553 | 0.071 | [0, 0.274] |
| MoBB | 4.27 | 0.439 | 0.42 | 0.909 | 0.909 | 0.063 | 0.196 | 0.086 | 0.189 | 0.111 | [0, 0.292] |
A total of 20 adult individuals were analyzed for each site. Expected (He) and observed (Ho) heterozygosity, proportion of polymorphic loci (P) with the commonest allele present at no more than 95 and 99%, average allelic richness over all loci (AR), inbreeding coefficient (FIS) and probability of deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) are indicated for the eleven polymorphic microsatellite loci used in this study. Estimations of the selfing rate (s) are shown for the two methods implemented: s(g2) and maximum likelihood (s(ML)). Power to reject the null hypothesis s = 0 at p<0.05 (Pg2 = 0), and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the ML method are also included.
The probability of detecting multiple paternity (PrDM) for different mating scenarios (from two to ten males) for the three sites along the Biobío River: Upper Biobío (UBB), Mid Biobío (MBB), and mouth of the river (MoBB).
This was determined by PrDM simulations involving 21 progeny sampled per clutch and a minimum of seven microsatellite markers. The simulated mating scenarios were based on the minimum and maximum number of sires reported by other studies of aquatic gastropods, and the relative male contribution (equal, moderately skewed, or highly skewed) of males to the brood was varied.
| Mating scenario | Relative male contributions (%) | PrDM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBB | MBB | MoBB | ||
| 2 males | (50:50) | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.990 |
| (75:25) | 0.98 | 0.989 | 0.979 | |
| (90:10) | 0.862 | 0.850 | 0.829 | |
| 3 males | (33:33:34) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| (50:25:25) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| (80:10:10) | 0.985 | 0.982 | 0.975 | |
| 7 males | (14:14:14:14:14:15:15) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| (30:20:15:10:10:10:5) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| (50:30:10:5:2:2:1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 10 males | (10:10:10:10:10:10:10:10:10:10) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| (30:10:10:10:10:10:5:5:5:5) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| (50:20:10:5:5:3:2:2:2:1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Paternity inference (number of sires within broods) conducted in GERUD and COLONY.
Pairwise relatedness (r) and mean pairwise difference in relatedness between sites were estimated in COLONY. Sire evenness within broods estimated from paternity assignments carried out in GERUD and COLONY are also shown.
| Family | Female | Loci | Paternity | Pairwise relatedness (r) | Difference mean(±95%) | Sire Evenness | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Mean | (±SD) | GERUD | COLONY | ||||
| F1 | UBB1 | 9/ 8 | 3/8 | 0.201 | 0.141 | 0.94 | 0.95 | |
| F2 | UBB2 | 10/ 8 | 2/2 | 0.451 | 0.006 | |||
| F3 | UBB3 | 10/7 | 4/4 | 0.297 | 0.075 | 0.96 | 0.99 | |
| F4 | UBB4 | 9/8 | 3/4 | 0.173 | 0.128 | 0.99 | ||
| F5 | UBB5 | 8/8 | 3/4 | 0.311 | 0.064 | 0.85 | 0.93 | |
| 1.072E002a | ||||||||
| F6 | MBB1 | 10/9 | 3/5 | 0.274 | 0.055 | (-1.038E002-1.052E002) | 0.93 | |
| F7 | MBB2 | 11/8 | 3/3 | 0.410 | 0.071 | 0.90 | ||
| F8 | MBB3 | 10/9 | 2/3 | 0.372 | 0.082 | |||
| F9 | MBB4 | 10/9 | 4/4 | 0.251 | 0.133 | 0.85 | 0.85 | |
| F10 | MBB5 | 11/8 | 3/3 | 0.377 | 0.05 | 0.90 | 0.99 | |
| 6.550E002b | ||||||||
| F11 | MoBB1 | 9/9 | 4/7 | 0.409 | 0.081 | (-1.069E002-1.030E002) | 0.92 | |
| F12 | MoBB2 | 10/10 | 3/4 | 0.297 | 0.088 | 0.98 | 0.91 | |
| F13 | MoBB3 | 11/8 | 4/5 | 0.261 | 0.066 | 0.97 | ||
| F14 | MoBB4 | 11/10 | 3/3 | 0.295 | 0.111 | 0.92 | ||
| F15 | MoBB5 | 10/10 | 2/4 | 0.379 | 0.075 | |||
| 7.623E002c | ||||||||
| (-1.077E002-1.084E002) | ||||||||
| Mean | 3.06/4.2 | |||||||
‡ N°loci: number of polymorphic microsatellite loci used in COLONY/GERUD respectively
ⱡ number of sires calculated in GERUD/COLONY.
+ mean pairwise differences in relatedness between sites were estimated by bootstrap analysis in COLONY: (a) = Sites UBB and MBB, (b) = Sites MBB and MoBB, (c) = Sites UBB and MoBB
*values in bold are significant (P<0.05).
Fig 1The relative contribution of sires to Chilina dombeiana broods from three sites of the Biobío River: the upper site (UBB), Mid site (MBB), and the mouth of the river site (MoBB).
The minimum number of fathers was estimated in GERUD. The colors within the bars depict the relative contribution of different sires to the broods (S1-S4). Stars above the bars indicate that paternal contributions within a brood deviated significantly from equality (goodness of fit X2 tests, P < 0.05).
Fig 2The relative contribution of sires to Chilina dombeiana broods from three sites of the Biobío River: the upper site (UBB), Mid site (MBB), and at the mouth of the river site (MoBB).
The maximum number of fathers was estimated in COLONY. The colors within the bars depict the relative contribution of different sires to the broods (S1-S8). Stars above the bars indicate that paternal contributions within a brood deviated significantly from equality (goodness of fit X2 tests, P < 0.05).