Literature DB >> 22220867

Does genetic diversity reduce sibling competition?

J David Aguirre1, Dustin J Marshall.   

Abstract

An enduring hypothesis for the proximal benefits of sex is that recombination increases the genetic variation among offspring and that this genetic variation increases offspring performance. A corollary of this hypothesis is that mothers that mate multiply increase genetic variation within a clutch and gain benefits due to genetic diversity alone. Many studies have demonstrated that multiple mating can increase offspring performance, but most attribute this increase to sexual selection and the role of genetic diversity has received less attention. Here, we used a breeding design to generate populations of full-siblings, half-siblings, and unrelated individuals of the solitary ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Importantly, we preclude the potentially confounding influences of maternal effects and sexual selection. We found that individuals in populations with greater genetic diversity had greater performance (metamorphic success, postmetamorphic survival, and postmetamorphic size) than individuals in populations with lower genetic diversity. Furthermore, we show that by mating with multiple males and thereby increasing genetic variation within a single clutch of offspring, females gain indirect fitness benefits in the absence of mate-choice. Our results show that when siblings are likely to interact, genetic variation among individuals can decrease competition for resources and generate substantial fitness benefits within a single generation.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution © 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22220867     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01413.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz; Evan T Alicuben; Jessica Grubman; Matthew Harkenrider; Nichelle Megowan; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Kinship and the evolution of social behaviours in the sea.

Authors:  Stephanie J Kamel; Richard K Grosberg
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Mating portfolios: bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating.

Authors:  Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Yukio Yasui; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The incidence and selection of multiple mating in plants.

Authors:  John R Pannell; Anne-Marie Labouche
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  A population of sexual Daphnia pulex resists invasion by asexual clones.

Authors:  David J Innes; Michael Ginn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Kin-mediated plasticity in alternative reproductive tactics.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Joseph L Tomkins; Bruno A Buzatto; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  Paternity Outcomes in the Freshwater Gastropod, Chilina dombeiana in the Biobío River, Chile.

Authors:  Jéssica Bórquez; Antonio Brante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating.

Authors:  Charlotta Kvarnemo; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.