Literature DB >> 7963009

The effects of signal frequency and absolute bandwidth on gap detection in noise.

K B Snell1, J R Ison, D R Frisina.   

Abstract

Whether temporal resolution in noisebursts is primarily determined by the highest frequency component in the signal or its absolute bandwidth remains unclear. In this study, the absolute bandwidths and upper cutoff frequencies of signal noisebursts were varied across broad frequency ranges, several times greater than previously jointly studied. The purpose was to determine how each independently affects detection, taking into consideration that bandwidth effects at one signal frequency might be very different from bandwidth effects at another. Gap detection thresholds were obtained for five subjects with normal hearing in a 2 IFC paradigm. Signals were noisebursts whose bandwidths and upper cutoff frequencies varied among 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 kHz. Their duration was 150 ms and they were presented at an overall level of 75 dB SPL above a 45 dB SPL white noise floor. The largest mean gap detection threshold, 6.98 ms, was obtained for a noiseburst with a bandwidth of 1 kHz and upper cutoff frequency of 12 kHz. The smallest mean gap detection threshold, 2.22 ms, was found with a bandwidth and upper cutoff frequency of 12 kHz. Significant interactions were found to exist between absolute bandwidth and upper cutoff frequency. Although gap detection thresholds generally decreased with increasing signal frequency and bandwidth, the pattern was complex. When the absolute bandwidth was at least one-half the upper cutoff frequency then upper cutoff frequency and not bandwidth determined gap sensitivity; but when the absolute bandwidth was less than one-half of the upper frequency, then both determined gap thresholds.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7963009     DOI: 10.1121/1.410288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

Review 1.  The biological basis of audition.

Authors:  Gregg H Recanzone; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Erol J Ozmeral; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Age-related alteration in processing of temporal sound features in the auditory midbrain of the CBA mouse.

Authors:  J P Walton; R D Frisina; W E O'Neill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Two-channel recording of auditory-evoked potentials to detect age-related deficits in temporal processing.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Edward Bartlett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Age-related differences in auditory processing as assessed by amplitude-modulation following responses in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Paul A Cunningham; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Salicylate-induced hearing loss and gap detection deficits in rats.

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Daniel J Stolzberg; Maxwell E Urban; Rachael A Bowler; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Auditory gap-in-noise detection behavior in ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Joshua R Gold; Fernando R Nodal; Fabian Peters; Andrew J King; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.