Literature DB >> 28049703

Pathway-Structured Predictive Model for Cancer Survival Prediction: A Two-Stage Approach.

Xinyan Zhang1, Yan Li1, Tomi Akinyemiju2, Akinyemi I Ojesina2, Phillip Buckhaults3, Nianjun Liu4, Bo Xu5, Nengjun Yi6.   

Abstract

Heterogeneity in terms of tumor characteristics, prognosis, and survival among cancer patients has been a persistent problem for many decades. Currently, prognosis and outcome predictions are made based on clinical factors and/or by incorporating molecular profiling data. However, inaccurate prognosis and prediction may result by using only clinical or molecular information directly. One of the main shortcomings of past studies is the failure to incorporate prior biological information into the predictive model, given strong evidence of the pathway-based genetic nature of cancer, i.e., the potential for oncogenes to be grouped into pathways based on biological functions such as cell survival, proliferation, and metastatic dissemination. To address this problem, we propose a two-stage approach to incorporate pathway information into the prognostic modeling using large-scale gene expression data. In the first stage, we fit all predictors within each pathway using the penalized Cox model and Bayesian hierarchical Cox model. In the second stage, we combine the cross-validated prognostic scores of all pathways obtained in the first stage as new predictors to build an integrated prognostic model for prediction. We apply the proposed method to analyze two independent breast and ovarian cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), predicting overall survival using large-scale gene expression profiling data. The results from both datasets show that the proposed approach not only improves survival prediction compared with the alternative analyses that ignore the pathway information, but also identifies significant biological pathways.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA); cancer prognosis; hierarchical Cox model; pathway; penalized Cox regression

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28049703      PMCID: PMC5223526          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.189191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  53 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Pre-validation and inference in microarrays.

Authors:  Robert J Tibshirani; Brad Efron
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2002-08-22

3.  Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues.

Authors:  Jelle J Goeman; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Targeting the Hedgehog pathway in cancer.

Authors:  Sachin Gupta; Naoko Takebe; Patricia Lorusso
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

7.  Pathway index models for construction of patient-specific risk profiles.

Authors:  Kevin H Eng; Sijian Wang; William H Bradley; Janet S Rader; Christina Kendziorski
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Classification of microarray data using gene networks.

Authors:  Franck Rapaport; Andrei Zinovyev; Marie Dutreix; Emmanuel Barillot; Jean-Philippe Vert
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Assessing the clinical utility of cancer genomic and proteomic data across tumor types.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Eliezer M Van Allen; Larsson Omberg; Nikhil Wagle; Ali Amin-Mansour; Artem Sokolov; Lauren A Byers; Yanxun Xu; Kenneth R Hess; Lixia Diao; Leng Han; Xuelin Huang; Michael S Lawrence; John N Weinstein; Josh M Stuart; Gordon B Mills; Levi A Garraway; Adam A Margolin; Gad Getz; Han Liang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pathway-structured predictive modeling for multi-level drug response in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Xinyan Zhang; Bingzong Li; Huiying Han; Sha Song; Hongxia Xu; Zixuan Yi; Yating Hong; Wenzhuo Zhuang; Nengjun Yi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Tightly integrated genomic and epigenomic data mining using tensor decomposition.

Authors:  Jianwen Fang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  BhGLM: Bayesian hierarchical GLMs and survival models, with applications to genomics and epidemiology.

Authors:  Nengjun Yi; Zaixiang Tang; Xinyan Zhang; Boyi Guo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Novel Application of Survival Models for Predicting Microbial Community Transitions with Variable Selection for Environmental DNA.

Authors:  Paul Bjorndahl; Joseph P Bielawski; Lihui Liu; Wei Zhou; Hong Gu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Learning-based Cancer Treatment Outcome Prognosis using Multimodal Biomarkers.

Authors:  Maliazurina Saad; Shenghua He; Wade Thorstad; Hiram Gay; Daniel Barnett; Yujie Zhao; Su Ruan; Xiaowei Wang; Hua Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-12

Review 6.  The Emerging Potential for Network Analysis to Inform Precision Cancer Medicine.

Authors:  Kivilcim Ozturk; Michelle Dow; Daniel E Carlin; Rafael Bejar; Hannah Carter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Deep Learning-Based Multi-Omics Integration Robustly Predicts Survival in Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Kumardeep Chaudhary; Olivier B Poirion; Liangqun Lu; Lana X Garmire
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Data-Driven Methods for Advancing Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Prema Nedungadi; Akshay Iyer; Georg Gutjahr; Jasmine Bhaskar; Asha B Pillai
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2018-03-06

Review 9.  The Application of Bayesian Methods in Cancer Prognosis and Prediction.

Authors:  Jiadong Chu; N A Sun; Wei Hu; Xuanli Chen; Nengjun Yi; Yueping Shen
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

10.  Identification of common oncogenic and early developmental pathways in the ovarian carcinomas controlling by distinct prognostically significant microRNA subsets.

Authors:  Vladimir A Kuznetsov; Zhiqun Tang; Anna V Ivshina
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.