Literature DB >> 23074142

Pathway index models for construction of patient-specific risk profiles.

Kevin H Eng1, Sijian Wang, William H Bradley, Janet S Rader, Christina Kendziorski.   

Abstract

Statistical methods for variable selection, prediction, and classification have proven extremely useful in moving personalized genomics medicine forward, in particular, leading to a number of genomic-based assays now in clinical use for predicting cancer recurrence. Although invaluable in individual cases, the information provided by these assays is limited. Most often, a patient is classified into one of very few groups (e.g., recur or not), limiting the potential for truly personalized treatment. Furthermore, although these assays provide information on which individuals are at most risk (e.g., those for which recurrence is predicted), they provide no information on the aberrant biological pathways that give rise to the increased risk. We have developed an approach to address these limitations. The approach models a time-to-event outcome as a function of known biological pathways, identifies important genomic aberrations, and provides pathway-based patient-specific assessments of risk. As we demonstrate in a study of ovarian cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas project, the patient-specific risk profiles are powerful and efficient characterizations useful in addressing a number of questions related to identifying informative patient subtypes and predicting survival.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23074142      PMCID: PMC3593986          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  26 in total

1.  Averaged gene expressions for regression.

Authors:  Mee Young Park; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Pathways to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Dan Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Patterns of gene expression that characterize long-term survival in advanced stage serous ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Andrew Berchuck; Edwin S Iversen; Johnathan M Lancaster; Jennifer Pittman; Jingqin Luo; Paula Lee; Susan Murphy; Holly K Dressman; Phillip G Febbo; Mike West; Joseph R Nevins; Jeffrey R Marks
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  An integrated genomic-based approach to individualized treatment of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Holly K Dressman; Andrew Berchuck; Gina Chan; Jun Zhai; Andrea Bild; Robyn Sayer; Janiel Cragun; Jennifer Clarke; Regina S Whitaker; Lihua Li; Jonathan Gray; Jeffrey Marks; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Anil Potti; Mike West; Joseph R Nevins; Johnathan M Lancaster
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A prognostic gene expression index in ovarian cancer - validation across different independent data sets.

Authors:  Carsten Denkert; Jan Budczies; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Balazs Györffy; Jalid Sehouli; Dominique Könsgen; Robert Zeillinger; Wilko Weichert; Aurelia Noske; Ann-Christin Buckendahl; Berit M Müller; Manfred Dietel; Hermann Lage
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Gene expression profile for predicting survival in advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer across two independent datasets.

Authors:  Kosuke Yoshihara; Atsushi Tajima; Tetsuro Yahata; Shoji Kodama; Hiroyuki Fujiwara; Mitsuaki Suzuki; Yoshitaka Onishi; Masayuki Hatae; Kazunobu Sueyoshi; Hisaya Fujiwara; Yoshiki Kudo; Kohei Kotera; Hideaki Masuzaki; Hironori Tashiro; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Ituro Inoue; Kenichi Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Univariate shrinkage in the cox model for high dimensional data.

Authors:  Robert J Tibshirani
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-04-14

Review 8.  Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Individualization of therapy using Mammaprint: from development to the MINDACT Trial.

Authors:  Stella Mook; Laura J Van't Veer; Emiel J T Rutgers; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

View more
  13 in total

1.  Pathway-structured predictive modeling for multi-level drug response in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Xinyan Zhang; Bingzong Li; Huiying Han; Sha Song; Hongxia Xu; Zixuan Yi; Yating Hong; Wenzhuo Zhuang; Nengjun Yi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Pathway-Structured Predictive Model for Cancer Survival Prediction: A Two-Stage Approach.

Authors:  Xinyan Zhang; Yan Li; Tomi Akinyemiju; Akinyemi I Ojesina; Phillip Buckhaults; Nianjun Liu; Bo Xu; Nengjun Yi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Más-o-menos: a simple sign averaging method for discrimination in genomic data analysis.

Authors:  Sihai Dave Zhao; Giovanni Parmigiani; Curtis Huttenhower; Levi Waldron
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Pathway aggregation for survival prediction via multiple kernel learning.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sinnott; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  The Emerging Potential for Network Analysis to Inform Precision Cancer Medicine.

Authors:  Kivilcim Ozturk; Michelle Dow; Daniel E Carlin; Rafael Bejar; Hannah Carter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Semi-supervised identification of cancer subgroups using survival outcomes and overlapping grouping information.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Zequn Sun; Willian A da Silveira; Zhenning Yu; Andrew Lawson; Gary Hardiman; Linda E Kelemen; Dongjun Chung
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  IPI59: An Actionable Biomarker to Improve Treatment Response in Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  J Choi; S Ye; K H Eng; K Korthauer; W H Bradley; J S Rader; C Kendziorski
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2016-03-29

8.  On representing the prognostic value of continuous gene expression biomarkers with the restricted mean survival curve.

Authors:  Kevin H Eng; Emily Schiller; Kayla Morrell
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-03

9.  Identification of prognostic genes and gene sets for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer using bi-level selection methods.

Authors:  Suyan Tian; Chi Wang; Howard H Chang; Jianguo Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparing gene expression data from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues and qPCR with that from snap-frozen tissue and microarrays for modeling outcomes of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  William H Bradley; Kevin Eng; Min Le; A Craig Mackinnon; Christina Kendziorski; Janet S Rader
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.