Literature DB >> 2803920

A limited sampling procedure for estimating adriamycin pharmacokinetics in cancer patients.

M C Launay1, G Milano, A Iliadis, M Frenay, N Namer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find a procedure allowing estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters for adriamycin with minimal cost and disturbance for the patient. Twenty-five patients with breast cancer were treated by short infusion of adriamycin at a dose of 12 mg m-2 week-1 (41 courses). Population characteristics were determined on 15 randomly chosen courses (10 patients, group I) in order to define two optimal sampling times (26 min and 24 h) and to perform Bayesian estimation on the remaining 26 courses (17 patients, group II). For patients of group II, Bayesian estimation (BE) associated with a reduced sub-optimal sampling protocol (20 min and 24 h) was compared with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), the classical procedure. Regression analysis of clearance values obtained after BE versus MLE indicated a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.969) with the slope (a = 0.991 +/- 0.085) and the intercept (b = 2.271 +/- 4.810) close to 1 and 0 respectively. This original method is thus valid to measure accurately adriamycin clearance; it improves patient comfort and can be used routinely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2803920      PMCID: PMC2247334          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1989.226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  15 in total

1.  How much does liver disease affect the pharmacokinetics of adriamycin?

Authors:  S B Kaye; J Cummings; D J Kerr
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-08

2.  Limited sampling model for vinblastine pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M J Ratain; N J Vogelzang
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1987-10

3.  Estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters and performance of Bayesian feedback: a sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  S Vozeh; C Steiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-10

4.  Forecasting individual pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S Beal; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from several least squares procedures: superiority of extended least squares.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1985-04

6.  Bayesian estimation and prediction of clearance in high-dose methotrexate infusions.

Authors:  A Iliadis; M Bachir-Raho; R Bruno; R Favre
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1985-02

7.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

8.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. II. Biexponential model and experimental pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-10

9.  Doxorubicin clearance in the obese.

Authors:  K A Rodvold; D A Rushing; D A Tewksbury
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Limited sampling models for amonafide (NSC 308847) pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M J Ratain; A E Staubus; R L Schilsky; L Malspeis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian parameter estimation and population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A H Thomson; B Whiting
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Doxorubicin and doxorubicinol: intra- and inter-individual variations of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  J M Jacquet; F Bressolle; M Galtier; M Bourrier; D Donadio; J Jourdan; J F Rossi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  A limited sampling method for estimation of the carboplatin area under the curve.

Authors:  B T Sørensen; A Strömgren; P Jakobsen; A Jakobsen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Limited-sampling models for anticancer agents.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in the development of new anthracyclines.

Authors:  J Robert
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Population pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin, etoposide and ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer patients: results of a multicentre study.

Authors:  G Freyer; B Tranchand; B Ligneau; C Ardiet; P J Souquet; I Court-Fortune; R Riou; P Rebattu; J P Boissel; V Trillet-Lenoir; P Girard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  A systematic review of limited sampling strategies for platinum agents used in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gabriel W Loh; Lillian S L Ting; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Anthracycline antibiotics in cancer therapy. Focus on drug resistance.

Authors:  D J Booser; G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.