Literature DB >> 17518507

A systematic review of limited sampling strategies for platinum agents used in cancer chemotherapy.

Gabriel W Loh1, Lillian S L Ting, Mary H H Ensom.   

Abstract

Despite evidence in the literature suggesting that a strong correlation exists between the pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic effect of anticancer agents, many of these agents are still dosed by body surface area. Therapeutic drug monitoring with the aim of pharmacokinetic-guided dosing would not only maintain target concentrations associated with efficacy but may potentially minimise the likelihood of dose-related systemic toxicities. The pharmacokinetic parameter that displays the best correlation with the pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). However, accurate determination of the AUC requires numerous blood samples over an extended interval, which is not feasible in clinical practice. Therefore, limited sampling strategies (LSSs) have been proposed as a means to accurately and precisely estimate pharmacokinetic parameters with a minimal number of blood samples. LSSs have been developed for many drugs, particularly ciclosporin and other immunosuppressants, as well as for certain anticancer drugs. This systematic review evaluates LSSs developed for the platinum compounds and categorises 18 pertinent citations according to criteria adapted from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Thirteen citations (four level I, six level II-1, three level II-2) pertained to LSSs for carboplatin, four citations (one level II-1, one level II-2, two level III) to cisplatin LSSs, and one citation (level II-2) to nedaplatin. Based on the current evidence, it appears that LSSs may be useful for pharmacokinetic-guided dosage adjustments of carboplatin in both adults and children with cancer. Although some validation studies suggest that LSSs can be extended to different cancer populations or different chemotherapy regimens, other studies dispute this finding. Although the use of LSSs to predict the pharmacokinetic parameters of cisplatin and nedaplatin appear promising, the quality of evidence from published studies does not support routine implementation at this time.LSSs represent one approach in which clinicians can make specific dosage adjustments for individual patients to optimise outcomes. However, the limitations of these strategies must also be taken into consideration. There is also a need for prospective studies to demonstrate that application of LSSs for platinum agents ultimately improves patient response and decreases systemic toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17518507     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200746060-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  77 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of platinum after nedaplatin administration and model validation in adult patients.

Authors:  Toru Ishibashi; Yoshitaka Yano; Takayoshi Oguma
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Ototoxicity of high-dose carboplatin.

Authors:  Christine Chevreau; Fabienne Thomas; Corinne Couteau; Florence Dalenc; Loic Mourey; Etienne Chatelut
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Validation of a limited sampling model for carboplatin in a high-dose chemotherapy combination.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; S Rodenhuis; O van Tellingen; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  A Bayesian dosing method for carboplatin given by continuous infusion for 120 h.

Authors:  P Guillet; S Monjanel; A Nicoara; F Duffaud; B Lacarelle; D Bagarry-Liegey; A Durand; J Catalin; R Favre
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  A multivariate analysis for predicting cisplatin-induced delayed emesis.

Authors:  X Pivot; N Marghali; M C Etienne; R J Bensadoun; A Thyss; J Otto; E François; N Renée; J L Lagrange; M Schneider; G Milano
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  A formula for predicting optimal dosage of nedaplatin based on renal function in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  T Ishibashi; Y Yano; T Oguma
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Limited and optimal sampling strategies for etoposide and etoposide catechol in children with leukemia.

Authors:  John Carl Panetta; Mark Wilkinson; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Limited sampling model for the area under the concentration versus time curve of irinotecan and its application to a multicentric phase II trial.

Authors:  N Yamamoto; T Tamura; Y Nishiwaki; Y Kurita; Y Kawakami; S Abe; T Nakabayashi; S Suzuki; T Matsuda; I Hayashi; T Takahashi; N Saijo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Population pharmacokinetics of carboplatin in children.

Authors:  E Chatelut; A V Boddy; B Peng; H Rubie; M Lavit; A Dezeuze; A D Pearson; H Roché; A Robert; D R Newell; P Canal
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  3 in total

1.  Limited-sampling strategies for anti-infective agents: systematic review.

Authors:  Denise A Sprague; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2009-09

2.  Development of a limited-sampling model for prediction of doxorubicin exposure in dogs.

Authors:  L A Wittenburg; D H Thamm; D L Gustafson
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.613

3.  Limited Sampling Strategy for Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Adult Chinese Heart Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Hongping Xiang; Hong Zhou; Jing Zhang; Yongfeng Sun; Yirong Wang; Yong Han; Jie Cai
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.810

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.