Literature DB >> 3694495

Estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters and performance of Bayesian feedback: a sensitivity analysis.

S Vozeh1, C Steiner.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of bias in the estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters on the performance of Bayesian feedback in achieving a desired drug serum concentration. Three specific cases were considered (i) steady-state case, (ii) lidocaine example, and (iii) mexiletine example. Whereas in the first case both the feedback and the desired concentration represented steady-state values, in the lidocaine and mexiletine examples the feedback concentration was assumed to be sampled shortly after starting therapy. RMSE was used as a measure of predictive performance. For the simple steady-state case the relationship between RMSE and bias in the parameter estimates describing the prior distribution could be derived analytically. Monte Carlo simulations were used to explore the two non-steady-state situations. In general, the performance of Bayesian feedback to predict serum concentrations was relatively insensitive to bad population parameter estimates. However, large changes in RMSE could be observed with small changes in the true variance component parameters in particular in the intraindividual residual variance, sigma 2 epsilon, indicating that the prediction interval, in contrast to point prediction, is sensitive to bias in the estimates of the population parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3694495     DOI: 10.1007/bf01061760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  14 in total

1.  Forecasting individual pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S Beal; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Modelling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer-aided drug dosage.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; B Rosenberg; K L Melmon
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1972-10

Review 3.  Feedback control methods for drug dosage optimisation. Concepts, classification and clinical application.

Authors:  S Vozeh; J L Steimer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A Bayesian feedback method of aminoglycoside dosing.

Authors:  M E Burton; D C Brater; P S Chen; R B Day; P J Huber; M R Vasko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

6.  Predicting individual phenytoin dosage.

Authors:  S Vozeh; K T Muir; L B Sheiner; F Follath
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-04

7.  Rapid prediction of individual dosage requirements for lignocaine.

Authors:  S Vozeh; M Berger; M Wenk; R Ritz; F Follath
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Computer-assisted individualized lidocaine dosage: clinical evaluation and comparison with physician performance.

Authors:  S Vozeh; T Uematsu; R Ritz; O Schmidlin; G Kaufman; A Scholer; F Follath
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Population pharmacokinetics of procainamide from routine clinical data.

Authors:  T H Grasela; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  N-Acetylprocainamide kinetics and clinical response during repeated dosing.

Authors:  J H Rodman; A Hurst; T Gaarder; J Cohen; R W Jelliffe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian parameter estimation and population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A H Thomson; B Whiting
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Population pharmacokinetics: theory and practice.

Authors:  L Aarons
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Evaluation of population (NONMEM) pharmacokinetic parameter estimates.

Authors:  S Vozeh; P O Maitre; D R Stanski
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1990-04

4.  Comparison of some control strategies for three-compartment PK/PD models.

Authors:  C Hu; W S Lovejoy; S L Shafer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-12

Review 5.  Sparse data analysis.

Authors:  L Aarons
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 6.  An efficient control strategy for dosage regimens.

Authors:  C Hu; W S Lovejoy; S L Shafer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-02

7.  Predictive performance of the Bayesian analysis: effects of blood sampling time, population parameters, and pharmacostatistical model.

Authors:  Y Tanigawara; I Yano; K Kawakatsu; K Nishimura; M Yasuhara; R Hori
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-02

Review 8.  Individualising aminoglycoside dosage regimens after therapeutic drug monitoring: simple or complex pharmacokinetic methods?

Authors:  M M Tod; C Padoin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Bayesian forecasting in paediatric populations.

Authors:  M M Fernández de Gatta; M J García; J M Lanao; A Domínguez-Gil
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Implementation and evaluation of a stochastic control strategy for individualizing teicoplanin dosage regimen.

Authors:  M Tod; P Alet; O Lortholary; O Petitjean
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.