Literature DB >> 3839529

Bayesian estimation and prediction of clearance in high-dose methotrexate infusions.

A Iliadis, M Bachir-Raho, R Bruno, R Favre.   

Abstract

Much attention has been paid to the problem of estimating the pharmacokinetic parameters of individual patients in order to optimize dosage choices. Individual kinetics determined by test-dose bolus injection are a basis for predicting drug concentrations after high-dose methotrexate infusion and for computing appropriate dosages. Simplifications may be attempted, even allowing the test-dose to be omitted by using Bayesian estimation rather than likelihood estimation. To individualize pharmacokinetic parameters, Bayesian estimation combines information about population characteristics and those of individuals based on few measured plasma levels during high-dose infusion. Application of this procedure to methotrexate reveals interesting predictive performances and ability to handle variation due to intraindividual time variability without using test doses. The methodology promises to be more efficient in computing dosages in order to avoid toxic levels and will be less expensive in routine clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3839529     DOI: 10.1007/bf01073659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  19 in total

1.  Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-10

Review 2.  Predicting steady state serum concentrations of drugs.

Authors:  D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 13.820

3.  Forecasting individual pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S Beal; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate with citrovorum factor rescue.

Authors:  W H Isacoff; P F Morrison; J Aroesty; K L Willis; J B Block; T L Lincoln
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1977-12

5.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. II. Biexponential model and experimental pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-10

6.  Predicting individual phenytoin dosage.

Authors:  S Vozeh; K T Muir; L B Sheiner; F Follath
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-04

7.  Bayesian individualization of pharmacokinetics: simple implementation and comparison with non-Bayesian methods.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Test dose for predicting high-dose methotrexate infusions.

Authors:  I G Kerr; J Jolivet; J M Collins; J C Drake; B A Chabner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetics parameters. I. Michaelis-Menten model: routine clinical pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1980-12
View more
  13 in total

1.  Dosing algorithm to target a predefined AUC in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma receiving high dose methotrexate.

Authors:  Markus Joerger; Andrés J M Ferreri; Stephan Krähenbühl; Jan H M Schellens; Thomas Cerny; Emanuele Zucca; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Dolores Aumente; Dolores Santos Buelga; John C Lukas; Pedro Gomez; Antonio Torres; Maria José García
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Bayesian parameter estimation and population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A H Thomson; B Whiting
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Bayesian population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses using mixture models.

Authors:  G L Rosner; P Müller
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-04

7.  Identification of patients with impaired hepatic drug metabolism using a limited sampling procedure for estimation of phenazone (antipyrine) pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  D Fabre; F Bressolle; R Goméni; O Bouvet; A Dubois; C Raffanel; J C Gris; M Galtier
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Population pharmacokinetics. Theory and clinical application.

Authors:  B Whiting; A W Kelman; J Grevel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Comparison of Sawchuk-Zaske and Bayesian forecasting for aminoglycosides in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  C P Denaro; P J Ravenscroft
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Evaluation of Bayesian estimation in comparison to NONMEM for population pharmacokinetic data analysis: application to pefloxacin in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  R Bruno; M C Iliadis; B Lacarelle; V Cosson; J W Mandema; Y Le Roux; G Montay; A Durand; M Ballereau; M Alasia
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.