Literature DB >> 28033416

Comparison of Safety Margin Generation Concepts in Image Guided Radiotherapy to Account for Daily Head and Neck Pose Variations.

Markus Stoll1,2, Eva Maria Stoiber1, Sarah Grimm1,2,3, Jürgen Debus1,2,4, Rolf Bendl1,2,3, Kristina Giske1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of head and neck tumors allows a precise conformation of the high-dose region to clinical target volumes (CTVs) while respecting dose limits to organs a risk (OARs). Accurate patient setup reduces translational and rotational deviations between therapy planning and therapy delivery days. However, uncertainties in the shape of the CTV and OARs due to e.g. small pose variations in the highly deformable anatomy of the head and neck region can still compromise the dose conformation. Routinely applied safety margins around the CTV cause higher dose deposition in adjacent healthy tissue and should be kept as small as possible.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this work we evaluate and compare three approaches for margin generation 1) a clinically used approach with a constant isotropic 3 mm margin, 2) a previously proposed approach adopting a spatial model of the patient and 3) a newly developed approach adopting a biomechanical model of the patient. All approaches are retrospectively evaluated using a large patient cohort of over 500 fraction control CT images with heterogeneous pose changes. Automatic methods for finding landmark positions in the control CT images are combined with a patient specific biomechanical finite element model to evaluate the CTV deformation.
RESULTS: The applied methods for deformation modeling show that the pose changes cause deformations in the target region with a mean motion magnitude of 1.80 mm. We found that the CTV size can be reduced by both variable margin approaches by 15.6% and 13.3% respectively, while maintaining the CTV coverage. With approach 3 an increase of target coverage was obtained.
CONCLUSION: Variable margins increase target coverage, reduce risk to OARs and improve healthy tissue sparing at the same time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28033416      PMCID: PMC5199113          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  29 in total

1.  Dosimetric treatment course simulation based on a statistical model of deformable organ motion.

Authors:  M Söhn; B Sobotta; M Alber
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparison of daily versus nondaily image-guided radiotherapy protocols for patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Yao Yu; Anthony L Michaud; Radhika Sreeraman; Tianxiao Liu; James A Purdy; Allen M Chen
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  An optimised IGRT correction vector determined from a displacement vector field: a proof of principle of a decision-making aid for re-planning.

Authors:  Eva Maria Stoiber; Michael Schwarz; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Kristina Giske
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Internal margin assessment using cine MRI analysis of deglutition in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Eric S Paulson; Julie A Bradley; Dian Wang; Ergun E Ahunbay; Christoper Schultz; X Allen Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Anisotropic margin expansions in 6 anatomic directions for oropharyngeal image guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Adam D Yock; Adam S Garden; Laurence E Court; Beth M Beadle; Lifei Zhang; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Local setup errors in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients immobilized with a custom-made device.

Authors:  Kristina Giske; Eva M Stoiber; Michael Schwarz; Armin Stoll; Marc W Muenter; Carmen Timke; Falk Roeder; Juergen Debus; Peter E Huber; Christian Thieke; Rolf Bendl
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Target definition in prostate, head, and neck.

Authors:  Coen Rasch; Roel Steenbakkers; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces radiation-induced morbidity and improves health-related quality of life: results of a nonrandomized prospective study using a standardized follow-up program.

Authors:  Marije R Vergeer; Patricia A H Doornaert; Derek H F Rietveld; C René Leemans; Ben J Slotman; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Patient-specific finite element modeling of respiratory lung motion using 4D CT image data.

Authors:  René Werner; Jan Ehrhardt; Rainer Schmidt; Heinz Handels
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.