Literature DB >> 23614778

An optimised IGRT correction vector determined from a displacement vector field: a proof of principle of a decision-making aid for re-planning.

Eva Maria Stoiber1, Michael Schwarz, Jürgen Debus, Rolf Bendl, Kristina Giske.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To present a new method that determines an optimised IGRT couch correction vector from a displacement vector field (DVF). The DVF is computed by a deformable image registration (DIR) method. The proposed method can improve the quality of volume-of-interest (VOI) alignment in image guided radiation therapy (IGRT), and can serve as a decision-making aid for re-planning.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The proposed method was demonstrated using the CT data sets of 11 head-and-neck cancer patients with daily kilovoltage control-CTs. A DVF was computed for each control-CT using a DIR method. The DVF was used for voxel tracking and re-contouring of the VOIs in the control-CTs. Then a rigid body transformation, which could be used as couch correction vector, was optimised. The aim of the optimisation process was to find a vector and rotations that map the deformed VOIs into a specified territory. This territory was defined by a margin extension of the VOIs at the time of the planning process. Within this extension, VOI motion and deformation was tolerated. The objective function in the optimisation process was the sum of all volume fractions outside the defined territories.
RESULTS: The proposed method was able to find a correction vector, which resulted in a coverage of the target volumes of at least 98% in 52.3% of all fractions. In contrast, a standard IGRT correction using a rigid registration method only fulfilled this criterion in 22.6% of all fractions. The optimisation process took an average of 1.5 minutes per fraction.
CONCLUSION: The knowledge of the deformation of the anatomy allows the determination of an optimised rigid correction vector using our method. The method ensures controlled mapping of the VOIs despite small deformations. If no optimised vector can be determined, re-planning should be considered. Thus, our method can also serve as a decision-making aid for re-planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23614778     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.790559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Safety Margin Generation Concepts in Image Guided Radiotherapy to Account for Daily Head and Neck Pose Variations.

Authors:  Markus Stoll; Eva Maria Stoiber; Sarah Grimm; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Kristina Giske
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The frequency of re-planning and its variability dependent on the modification of the re-planning criteria and IGRT correction strategy in head and neck IMRT.

Authors:  Markus Stoll; Kristina Giske; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Eva Maria Stoiber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Analyzing human decisions in IGRT of head-and-neck cancer patients to teach image registration algorithms what experts know.

Authors:  Eva Maria Stoiber; Nina Bougatf; Hendrik Teske; Christian Bierstedt; Dieter Oetzel; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Kristina Giske
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Using gamma index to flag changes in anatomy during image-guided radiation therapy of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Bryan Schaly; Jeff Kempe; Varagur Venkatesan; Sylvia Mitchell; Jerry J Battista
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.