Literature DB >> 23906931

Anisotropic margin expansions in 6 anatomic directions for oropharyngeal image guided radiation therapy.

Adam D Yock1, Adam S Garden, Laurence E Court, Beth M Beadle, Lifei Zhang, Lei Dong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to determine the expansions in 6 anatomic directions that produced optimal margins considering nonrigid setup errors and tissue deformation for patients receiving image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of the oropharynx. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 20 patients who had received IGRT to the head and neck, we deformably registered each patient's daily images acquired with a computed tomography (CT)-on-rails system to his or her planning CT. By use of the resulting vector fields, the positions of volume elements within the clinical target volume (CTV) (target voxels) or within a 1-cm shell surrounding the CTV (normal tissue voxels) on the planning CT were identified on each daily CT. We generated a total of 15,625 margins by dilating the CTV by 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 mm in the posterior, anterior, lateral, medial, inferior, and superior directions. The optimal margins were those that minimized the relative volume of normal tissue voxels positioned within the margin while satisfying 1 of 4 geometric target coverage criteria and 1 of 3 population criteria.
RESULTS: Each pair of geometric target coverage and population criteria resulted in a unique, anisotropic, optimal margin. The optimal margin expansions ranged in magnitude from 1 to 5 mm depending on the anatomic direction of the expansion and on the geometric target coverage and population criteria. Typically, the expansions were largest in the medial direction, were smallest in the lateral direction, and increased with the demand of the criteria. The anisotropic margin resulting from the optimal set of expansions always included less normal tissue than did any isotropic margin that satisfied the same pair of criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the potential of anisotropic margins to reduce normal tissue exposure without compromising target coverage in IGRT to the head and neck.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23906931      PMCID: PMC4063302          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.

Authors:  M van Herk; P Remeijer; C Rasch; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Evaluation of the planning target volume in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: what is the appropriate expansion margin in the setting of daily image guidance?

Authors:  Allen M Chen; D Gregory Farwell; Quang Luu; Paul J Donald; Julian Perks; James A Purdy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons.

Authors:  J P Thirion
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins.

Authors:  Minoru Suzuki; Yasumasa Nishimura; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Masahiko Okumura; Hisayuki Hashiba; Ryuta Koike; Shuichi Kanamori; Toru Shibata
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Adaptive radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: initial clinical outcomes from a prospective trial.

Authors:  David L Schwartz; Adam S Garden; Jimmy Thomas; Yipei Chen; Yongbin Zhang; Jan Lewin; Mark S Chambers; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Nonrigid patient setup errors in the head-and-neck region.

Authors:  Buelent Polat; Juergen Wilbert; Kurt Baier; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system.

Authors:  Jerry L Barker; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang; Jennifer C O'Daniel; He Wang; Laurence E Court; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; K S Clifford Chao; Susan L Tucker; Radhe Mohan; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?

Authors:  F Houghton; R J Benson; G S J Tudor; J Fairfoul; J Gemmill; J C Dean; D S Routsis; S J Jefferies; N G Burnet
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Daily image guidance with cone-beam computed tomography for head-and-neck cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Robert B Den; Anthony Doemer; Greg Kubicek; Greg Bednarz; James M Galvin; William M Keane; Ying Xiao; Mitchell Machtay
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance.

Authors:  Simon van Kranen; Suzanne van Beek; Coen Rasch; Marcel van Herk; Jan-Jakob Sonke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Safety Margin Generation Concepts in Image Guided Radiotherapy to Account for Daily Head and Neck Pose Variations.

Authors:  Markus Stoll; Eva Maria Stoiber; Sarah Grimm; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Kristina Giske
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Robust plan optimization using edge-enhanced intensity for intrafraction organ deformation in prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Indra J Das; Yusuke Anetai; Hisao Kizaki; Keiko Aboshi; Mari Tsujii; Yuji Yamada; Keisuke Tamari; Yuji Seo; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yasuo Yoshioka; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.