Literature DB >> 15983939

Target definition in prostate, head, and neck.

Coen Rasch1, Roel Steenbakkers, Marcel van Herk.   

Abstract

Target definition is a major source of errors in both prostate and head and neck external-beam radiation treatment. Delineation errors remain constant during the course of radiation and therefore have a large impact on the dose to the tumor. Major sources of delineation variation are visibility of the target including its extensions, disagreement on the target extension, and interpretation or lack of delineation protocols. The visibility of the target can be greatly improved with the use of multimodality imaging. Both in the head and neck and the prostate, computed tomography (CT)-magnetic resonance imaging coregistration decreases the target volume and its variability. CT-positron emission tomography delineation is promising for delineation in head and neck cancer. Despite the better visibility, a different interpretation of the target extension remains a major source of error. The use of coregistration of CT with a second modality, together with improved guidelines for delineation and an online anatomical atlas, increases agreement between observers in prostate, lung, and nasopharynx tumors. Delineation errors should not be treated differently from other geometrical errors. Similar margin recipes for the correction of setup errors and organ motion should be adapted to incorporate the effect of delineation errors. A calculation of a 3-dimensional clinical target volume-planning target volume margin incorporating delineation errors for the head and neck is around 6.1 to 9.7 mm. Given the good local control of IMRT with smaller margins and smaller pathological specimens, it is likely that the delineated CTV frequently overestimates the actual volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15983939     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  62 in total

1.  Critical discussion of evaluation parameters for inter-observer variability in target definition for radiation therapy.

Authors:  I Fotina; C Lütgendorf-Caucig; M Stock; R Pötter; D Georg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Human-computer interaction in radiotherapy target volume delineation: a prospective, multi-institutional comparison of user input devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Fused radioimmunoscintigraphy for treatment planning.

Authors:  Rodney J Ellis; Deborah A Kaminsky
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

4.  Intrafractional motion of the prostate during hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yaoqin Xie; David Djajaputra; Christopher R King; Sabbir Hossain; Lijun Ma; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Standardization for oncologic head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Ohad Ronen; K Thomas Robbins; Remco de Bree; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Dana M Hartl; Akihiro Homma; Avi Khafif; Luiz P Kowalski; Fernando López; Antti A Mäkitie; Wai Tong Ng; Alessandra Rinaldo; Juan P Rodrigo; Alvaro Sanabria; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  A hybrid strategy of offline adaptive planning and online image guidance for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yu Lei; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Decreased 3D observer variation with matched CT-MRI, for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer.

Authors:  Coen R N Rasch; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Isabelle Fitton; Joop C Duppen; Peter J C M Nowak; Frank A Pameijer; Avraham Eisbruch; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Frank Paulsen; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Impact of inter- and intrafraction deviations and residual set-up errors on PTV margins. Different alignment techniques in 3D conformal prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  T Langsenlehner; C Döller; P Winkler; G Gallé; K S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.

Authors:  C F Njeh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.