Literature DB >> 29457229

Radiomics analysis of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT for early detection of lung cancer.

Wookjin Choi1, Jung Hun Oh1, Sadegh Riyahi1, Chia-Ju Liu2, Feng Jiang3, Wengen Chen4, Charles White4, Andreas Rimner5, James G Mechalakos1, Joseph O Deasy1, Wei Lu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a radiomics prediction model to improve pulmonary nodule (PN) classification in low-dose CT. To compare the model with the American College of Radiology (ACR) Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) for early detection of lung cancer.
METHODS: We examined a set of 72 PNs (31 benign and 41 malignant) from the Lung Image Database Consortium image collection (LIDC-IDRI). One hundred three CT radiomic features were extracted from each PN. Before the model building process, distinctive features were identified using a hierarchical clustering method. We then constructed a prediction model by using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier coupled with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). A tenfold cross-validation (CV) was repeated ten times (10 × 10-fold CV) to evaluate the accuracy of the SVM-LASSO model. Finally, the best model from the 10 × 10-fold CV was further evaluated using 20 × 5- and 50 × 2-fold CVs.
RESULTS: The best SVM-LASSO model consisted of only two features: the bounding box anterior-posterior dimension (BB_AP) and the standard deviation of inverse difference moment (SD_IDM). The BB_AP measured the extension of a PN in the anterior-posterior direction and was highly correlated (r = 0.94) with the PN size. The SD_IDM was a texture feature that measured the directional variation of the local homogeneity feature IDM. Univariate analysis showed that both features were statistically significant and discriminative (P = 0.00013 and 0.000038, respectively). PNs with larger BB_AP or smaller SD_IDM were more likely malignant. The 10 × 10-fold CV of the best SVM model using the two features achieved an accuracy of 84.6% and 0.89 AUC. By comparison, Lung-RADS achieved an accuracy of 72.2% and 0.77 AUC using four features (size, type, calcification, and spiculation). The prediction improvement of SVM-LASSO comparing to Lung-RADS was statistically significant (McNemar's test P = 0.026). Lung-RADS misclassified 19 cases because it was mainly based on PN size, whereas the SVM-LASSO model correctly classified 10 of these cases by combining a size (BB_AP) feature and a texture (SD_IDM) feature. The performance of the SVM-LASSO model was stable when leaving more patients out with five- and twofold CVs (accuracy 84.1% and 81.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: We developed an SVM-LASSO model to predict malignancy of PNs with two CT radiomic features. We demonstrated that the model achieved an accuracy of 84.6%, which was 12.4% higher than Lung-RADS.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990CTzzm321990; zzm321990SVMzzm321990; lung cancer; pulmonary nodule; radiomics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29457229      PMCID: PMC5903960          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  39 in total

1.  Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans.

Authors:  S G Armato; M L Giger; C J Moran; J T Blackburn; K Doi; H MacMahon
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  A pattern classification approach to characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules imaged on high resolution CT: preliminary results.

Authors:  M F McNitt-Gray; E M Hart; N Wyckoff; J W Sayre; J G Goldin; D R Aberle
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for distinction between benign and malignant nodules in thoracic low-dose CT by use of massive training artificial neural network.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki; Feng Li; Shusuke Sone; Kunio Doi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging.

Authors:  K Doi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Sarah DeMello; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Brenda Brewer; Timothy R Church; Kathy L Clingan; Fenghai Duan; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine A Gatsonis; David S Gierada; Amanda Jain; Gordon C Jones; Irene Mahon; Pamela M Marcus; Joshua M Rathmell; JoRean Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Reproducibility and Prognosis of Quantitative Features Extracted from CT Images.

Authors:  Yoganand Balagurunathan; Yuhua Gu; Hua Wang; Virendra Kumar; Olya Grove; Sam Hawkins; Jongphil Kim; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  A review of computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic and colonic imaging.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-09

8.  Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program.

Authors:  Brady J McKee; Shawn M Regis; Andrea B McKee; Sebastian Flacke; Christoph Wald
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Modeling pathologic response of esophageal cancer to chemoradiation therapy using spatial-temporal 18F-FDG PET features, clinical parameters, and demographics.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Shan Tan; Wengen Chen; Seth Kligerman; Grace Kim; Warren D D'Souza; Mohan Suntharalingam; Wei Lu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  30 in total

1.  Integrating manual diagnosis into radiomics for reducing the false positive rate of 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnosis in patients with suspected lung cancer.

Authors:  Fei Kang; Wei Mu; Jie Gong; Shengjun Wang; Guoquan Li; Guiyu Li; Wei Qin; Jie Tian; Jing Wang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The radiomic-clinical model using the SHAP method for assessing the treatment response of whole-brain radiotherapy: a multicentric study.

Authors:  Yixin Wang; Jinwei Lang; Joey Zhaoyu Zuo; Yaqin Dong; Zongtao Hu; Xiuli Xu; Yongkang Zhang; Qinjie Wang; Lizhuang Yang; Stephen T C Wong; Hongzhi Wang; Hai Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Non-invasive evaluation for benign and malignant subcentimeter pulmonary ground-glass nodules (≤1 cm) based on CT texture analysis.

Authors:  Xianghua Hu; Weichuan Ye; Zhongxue Li; Chunmiao Chen; Shimiao Cheng; Xiuling Lv; Wei Weng; Jie Li; Qiaoyou Weng; Peipei Pang; Min Xu; Minjiang Chen; Jiansong Ji
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  External validation of radiomics-based predictive models in low-dose CT screening for early lung cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Noemi Garau; Chiara Paganelli; Paul Summers; Wookjin Choi; Sadegh Alam; Wei Lu; Cristiana Fanciullo; Massimo Bellomi; Guido Baroni; Cristiano Rampinelli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Validation of the BRODERS classifier (Benign versus aggRessive nODule Evaluation using Radiomic Stratification), a novel HRCT-based radiomic classifier for indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Fabien Maldonado; Cyril Varghese; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Fenghai Duan; Aneri B Balar; Dhairya A Lakhani; Sanja L Antic; Pierre P Massion; Tucker F Johnson; Ronald A Karwoski; Richard A Robb; Brian J Bartholmai; Tobias Peikert
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  Solitary pulmonary nodule imaging approaches and the role of optical fibre-based technologies.

Authors:  Susan Fernandes; Gareth Williams; Elvira Williams; Katjana Ehrlich; James Stone; Neil Finlayson; Mark Bradley; Robert R Thomson; Ahsan R Akram; Kevin Dhaliwal
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 16.671

7.  Radiomics Based Bayesian Inversion Method for Prediction of Cancer and Pathological Stage.

Authors:  Hina Shakir; Tariq Khan; Haroon Rasheed; Yiming Deng
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.316

8.  Reproducible and Interpretable Spiculation Quantification for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Wookjin Choi; Saad Nadeem; Sadegh R Alam; Joseph O Deasy; Allen Tannenbaum; Wei Lu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  A comparison of the fusion model of deep learning neural networks with human observation for lung nodule detection and classification.

Authors:  Ayşegül Gürsoy Çoruh; Bülent Yenigün; Çağlar Uzun; Yusuf Kahya; Emre Utkan Büyükceran; Atilla Elhan; Kaan Orhan; Ayten Kayı Cangır
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Machine Learning Radiomics Model for Early Identification of Small-Cell Lung Cancer on Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Rajesh P Shah; Heather M Selby; Pritam Mukherjee; Shefali Verma; Peiyi Xie; Qinmei Xu; Millie Das; Sachin Malik; Olivier Gevaert; Sandy Napel
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.