PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is an effective method for detecting and characterizing lung nodules in vivo. With the growing use of chest CT, the detection frequency of lung nodules is increasing. Noninvasive methods to distinguish malignant from benign nodules have the potential to decrease the clinical burden, risk, and cost involved in follow-up procedures on the large number of false-positive lesions detected. This study examined the benefit of including perinodular parenchymal features in machine learning (ML) tools for pulmonary nodule assessment. METHODS: Lung nodule cases with pathology confirmed diagnosis (74 malignant, 289 benign) were used to extract quantitative imaging characteristics from computed tomography scans of the nodule and perinodular parenchyma tissue. A ML tool development pipeline was employed using k-medoids clustering and information theory to determine efficient predictor sets for different amounts of parenchyma inclusion and build an artificial neural network classifier. The resulting ML tool was validated using an independent cohort (50 malignant, 50 benign). RESULTS: The inclusion of parenchymal imaging features improved the performance of the ML tool over exclusively nodular features (P < 0.01). The best performing ML tool included features derived from nodule diameter-based surrounding parenchyma tissue quartile bands. We demonstrate similar high-performance values on the independent validation cohort (AUC-ROC = 0.965). A comparison using the independent validation cohort with the Fleischner pulmonary nodule follow-up guidelines demonstrated a theoretical reduction in recommended follow-up imaging and procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomic features extracted from the parenchyma surrounding lung nodules contain valid signals with spatial relevance for the task of lung cancer risk classification. Through standardization of feature extraction regions from the parenchyma, ML tool validation performance of 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity was achieved.
PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is an effective method for detecting and characterizing lung nodules in vivo. With the growing use of chest CT, the detection frequency of lung nodules is increasing. Noninvasive methods to distinguish malignant from benign nodules have the potential to decrease the clinical burden, risk, and cost involved in follow-up procedures on the large number of false-positive lesions detected. This study examined the benefit of including perinodular parenchymal features in machine learning (ML) tools for pulmonary nodule assessment. METHODS: Lung nodule cases with pathology confirmed diagnosis (74 malignant, 289 benign) were used to extract quantitative imaging characteristics from computed tomography scans of the nodule and perinodular parenchyma tissue. A ML tool development pipeline was employed using k-medoids clustering and information theory to determine efficient predictor sets for different amounts of parenchyma inclusion and build an artificial neural network classifier. The resulting ML tool was validated using an independent cohort (50 malignant, 50 benign). RESULTS: The inclusion of parenchymal imaging features improved the performance of the ML tool over exclusively nodular features (P < 0.01). The best performing ML tool included features derived from nodule diameter-based surrounding parenchyma tissue quartile bands. We demonstrate similar high-performance values on the independent validation cohort (AUC-ROC = 0.965). A comparison using the independent validation cohort with the Fleischner pulmonary nodule follow-up guidelines demonstrated a theoretical reduction in recommended follow-up imaging and procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomic features extracted from the parenchyma surrounding lung nodules contain valid signals with spatial relevance for the task of lung cancer risk classification. Through standardization of feature extraction regions from the parenchyma, ML tool validation performance of 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity was achieved.
Authors: Samantha K N Dilger; Johanna Uthoff; Alexandra Judisch; Emily Hammond; Sarah L Mott; Brian J Smith; John D Newell; Eric A Hoffman; Jessica C Sieren Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2015-09-01
Authors: Heber MacMahon; David P Naidich; Jin Mo Goo; Kyung Soo Lee; Ann N C Leung; John R Mayo; Atul C Mehta; Yoshiharu Ohno; Charles A Powell; Mathias Prokop; Geoffrey D Rubin; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; William D Travis; Paul E Van Schil; Alexander A Bankier Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Emily Hammond; Chelsea Sloan; John D Newell; Jered P Sieren; Melissa Saylor; Craig Vidal; Shayna Hogue; Frank De Stefano; Alexa Sieren; Eric A Hoffman; Jessica C Sieren Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jason L Causey; Junyu Zhang; Shiqian Ma; Bo Jiang; Jake A Qualls; David G Politte; Fred Prior; Shuzhong Zhang; Xiuzhen Huang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Johanna M Uthoff; Sarah L Mott; Jared Larson; Christine M Neslund-Dudas; Ann G Schwartz; Jessica C Sieren Journal: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Date: 2022-04-29
Authors: Johanna Uthoff; Prashant Nagpal; Rolando Sanchez; Thomas J Gross; Changhyun Lee; Jessica C Sieren Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2019-12
Authors: Kenneth P Seastedt; Dana Moukheiber; Saurabh A Mahindre; Chaitanya Thammineni; Darin T Rosen; Ammara A Watkins; Daniel A Hashimoto; Chuong D Hoang; Jacques Kpodonu; Leo A Celi Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: José Lucas Leite Calheiros; Lucas Benevides Viana de Amorim; Lucas Lins de Lima; Ailton Felix de Lima Filho; José Raniery Ferreira Júnior; Marcelo Costa de Oliveira Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 4.903
Authors: Stephen Baek; Yusen He; Bryan G Allen; John M Buatti; Brian J Smith; Ling Tong; Zhiyu Sun; Jia Wu; Maximilian Diehn; Billy W Loo; Kristin A Plichta; Steven N Seyedin; Maggie Gannon; Katherine R Cabel; Yusung Kim; Xiaodong Wu Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 4.379