Literature DB >> 32272493

The Predictive Value of Early Changes in 18 F-Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography During Fulvestrant 500 mg Therapy in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Min He1,2, Cheng Liu2,3,4,5, Qin Shi2,3,4,5, Yuyun Sun2,3,4,5, Yongping Zhang2,3,4,5, Xiaoping Xu2,3,4,5, Huiyu Yuan2,3,4,5, Yingjian Zhang2,3,4,5, Yin Liu1,2, Guangyu Liu1,2, Genhong Di1,2, Zhongyi Yang2,3,4,5, Zhonghua Wang1,2, Zhiming Shao1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of early changes in 18 F-fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) during fulvestrant 500 mg therapy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients underwent 18 F-FES PET/CT scans at both baseline (scan 1) and day 28 (scan 2). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of all metastatic sites was determined in each scan, and the percentage reduction in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax) was calculated as [(SUVmax on scan 1-SUVmax on scan 2)/ SUVmax on scan 1] * 100%.
RESULTS: In total, 294 18 F-FES-positive lesions from 36 patients were identified. The 18 F-FES SUVmax varied widely among lesions (median 5.7; range 1.8-32.4) and patients (median 5.1; range 2.5-13.2). After treatment, the median SUVmax among lesions and patients was 2.1 and 2.1, respectively. The ΔSUVmax ranged from -5.1% to 100%, with a median reduction of 61.3%. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff point to discriminate patients who could derive clinical benefit from fulvestrant was determined to be 38.0%. Patients with a median ΔSUVmax ≥38.0% experienced significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with ΔSUVmax <38.0% (28.0 months vs. 3.5 months, p = .003). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ΔSUVmax ≥38.0% was an independent predictor of PFS benefit in patients receiving fulvestrant therapy.
CONCLUSION: Changes in SUVmax measured by serial imaging of 18 F-FES PET/CT could be used early to predict PFS benefit in patients receiving fulvestrant therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of 18 F-fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in predicting response to fulvestrant 500 mg therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This study highlights the utility of FES PET/CT as a predictive factor to discriminate patients who might benefit from fulvestrant. Moreover, these findings showed that this molecular imaging technique might be a potential tool for physicians to make individualized treatment strategies. © AlphaMed Press 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FES PET/CT; Fulvestrant; Metastatic breast cancer; Predictive factor; ΔSUVmax

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32272493      PMCID: PMC7648347          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  42 in total

1.  18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT Measurement of Estrogen Receptor Suppression during a Phase I Trial of the Novel Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Therapeutic GDC-0810: Using an Imaging Biomarker to Guide Drug Dosage in Subsequent Trials.

Authors:  Yingbing Wang; Karen L Ayres; Debra A Goldman; Maura N Dickler; Aditya Bardia; Ingrid A Mayer; Eric Winer; Jill Fredrickson; Carlos L Arteaga; José Baselga; Henry C Manning; Umar Mahmood; Gary A Ulaner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Distinct mechanisms of loss of estrogen receptor alpha gene expression in human breast cancer: methylation of the gene and alteration of trans-acting factors.

Authors:  T Yoshida; H Eguchi; K Nakachi; K Tanimoto; Y Higashi; K Suemasu; Y Iino; Y Morishita; S Hayashi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  A good drug made better: the fulvestrant dose-response story.

Authors:  John F R Robertson; Justin Lindemann; Sally Garnett; Elizabeth Anderson; Robert I Nicholson; Irene Kuter; Julia M W Gee
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: Current Status and Potential Future Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Geraldine J Liao; Amy S Clark; Erin K Schubert; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Measuring residual estrogen receptor availability during fulvestrant therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Michel van Kruchten; Elisabeth G de Vries; Andor W Glaudemans; Meta C van Lanschot; Martijn van Faassen; Ido P Kema; Myles Brown; Carolien P Schröder; Erik F de Vries; Geke A Hospers
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 6.  PET imaging of oestrogen receptors in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Michel van Kruchten; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Myles Brown; Erik F J de Vries; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Carolien P Schröder; Geke A P Hospers
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Efficacy and safety of fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiayu Wang; Binghe Xu; Wenna Wang; Xiaoyu Zhai; Xuelian Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  [18F]fluoroestradiol radiation dosimetry in human PET studies.

Authors:  D A Mankoff; L M Peterson; T J Tewson; J M Link; J R Gralow; M M Graham; K A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  The preliminary study of 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol PET/CT in assisting the individualized treatment decisions of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yifei Sun; Zhongyi Yang; Yongping Zhang; Jing Xue; Mingwei Wang; Wei Shi; Beiling Zhu; Silong Hu; Zhifeng Yao; Herong Pan; Yingjian Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Genetic Landscape and Clonal Evolution of Breast Cancer Resistance to Palbociclib plus Fulvestrant in the PALOMA-3 Trial.

Authors:  Ben O'Leary; Rosalind J Cutts; Yuan Liu; Sarah Hrebien; Xin Huang; Kerry Fenwick; Fabrice André; Sibylle Loibl; Sherene Loi; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Massimo Cristofanilli; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 39.397

View more
  4 in total

1.  Whole-genome circulating tumor DNA methylation landscape reveals sensitive biomarkers of breast cancer.

Authors:  Luo Hai; Lingyu Li; Zongzhi Liu; Zhongsheng Tong; Yingli Sun
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  AMEERA-1 phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant, SAR439859, in postmenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Aditya Bardia; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Hannah M Linden; Mario Campone; Gary A Ulaner; Alice Gosselin; Sylvaine Cartot-Cotton; Patrick Cohen; Séverine Doroumian; Gautier Paux; Marina Celanovic; Vasiliki Pelekanou; Jeffrey E Ming; Nils Ternès; Monsif Bouaboula; Joon Sang Lee; Anne-Laure Bauchet
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Dual Tracers of 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-Estradiol and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose for Prediction of Progression-Free Survival After Fulvestrant Therapy in Patients With HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Xiaoping Xu; Huiyu Yuan; Yongping Zhang; Yingjian Zhang; Shaoli Song; Zhongyi Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Evaluation of tumour heterogeneity by 18F-fluoroestradiol PET as a predictive measure in breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Shihui Hu; Xiaoping Xu; Yongping Zhang; Biyun Wang; Shaoli Song; Zhongyi Yang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 8.408

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.