Literature DB >> 28006899

In Silico Prediction of Physicochemical Properties of Environmental Chemicals Using Molecular Fingerprints and Machine Learning.

Qingda Zang1, Kamel Mansouri2, Antony J Williams2, Richard S Judson2, David G Allen1, Warren M Casey3, Nicole C Kleinstreuer3.   

Abstract

There are little available toxicity data on the vast majority of chemicals in commerce. High-throughput screening (HTS) studies, such as those being carried out by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ToxCast program in partnership with the federal Tox21 research program, can generate biological data to inform models for predicting potential toxicity. However, physicochemical properties are also needed to model environmental fate and transport, as well as exposure potential. The purpose of the present study was to generate an open-source quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) workflow to predict a variety of physicochemical properties that would have cross-platform compatibility to integrate into existing cheminformatics workflows. In this effort, decades-old experimental property data sets available within the EPA EPI Suite were reanalyzed using modern cheminformatics workflows to develop updated QSPR models capable of supplying computationally efficient, open, and transparent HTS property predictions in support of environmental modeling efforts. Models were built using updated EPI Suite data sets for the prediction of six physicochemical properties: octanol-water partition coefficient (logP), water solubility (logS), boiling point (BP), melting point (MP), vapor pressure (logVP), and bioconcentration factor (logBCF). The coefficient of determination (R2) between the estimated values and experimental data for the six predicted properties ranged from 0.826 (MP) to 0.965 (BP), with model performance for five of the six properties exceeding those from the original EPI Suite models. The newly derived models can be employed for rapid estimation of physicochemical properties within an open-source HTS workflow to inform fate and toxicity prediction models of environmental chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28006899      PMCID: PMC6131700          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  46 in total

1.  Estimation of the aqueous solubility of organic molecules by the group contribution approach.

Authors:  G Klopman; H Zhu
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  Support vector machines for the estimation of aqueous solubility.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Tatiana Maltseva
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

3.  ACToR--Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource.

Authors:  Richard Judson; Ann Richard; David Dix; Keith Houck; Fathi Elloumi; Matthew Martin; Tommy Cathey; Thomas R Transue; Richard Spencer; Maritja Wolf
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints.

Authors:  Chun Wei Yap
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 5.  Recent advances on aqueous solubility prediction.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.339

6.  Identification of heparin samples that contain impurities or contaminants by chemometric pattern recognition analysis of proton NMR spectral data.

Authors:  Qingda Zang; David A Keire; Lucinda F Buhse; Richard D Wood; Dinesh P Mital; Syed Haque; Shankar Srinivasan; Christine M V Moore; Moheb Nasr; Ali Al-Hakim; Michael L Trehy; William J Welsh
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Phenotypic screening of the ToxCast chemical library to classify toxic and therapeutic mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Jian Yang; Ellen L Berg; Thomas B Knudsen; Ann M Richard; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Richard S Judson; Mark Polokoff; David J Dix; Robert J Kavlock; Keith A Houck
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Assessing the validity of QSARs for ready biodegradability of chemicals: an applicability domain perspective.

Authors:  Faizan Sahigara; Davide Ballabio; Roberto Todeschini; Viviana Consonni
Journal:  Curr Comput Aided Drug Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.606

9.  Determination of galactosamine impurities in heparin samples by multivariate regression analysis of their (1)H NMR spectra.

Authors:  Qingda Zang; David A Keire; Richard D Wood; Lucinda F Buhse; Christine M V Moore; Moheb Nasr; Ali Al-Hakim; Michael L Trehy; William J Welsh
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Testing Chemical Safety: What Is Needed to Ensure the Widespread Application of Non-animal Approaches?

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Fiona Sewell; Kathryn Chapman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  24 in total

1.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Qingda Zang; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Shannon Bell; Nicole Kleinstreuer; David Allen; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Warren Casey; Judy Strickland
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.446

2.  Demonstration of a consensus approach for the calculation of physicochemical properties required for environmental fate assessments.

Authors:  Caroline Tebes-Stevens; Jay M Patel; Michaela Koopmans; John Olmstead; Said H Hilal; Nick Pope; Eric J Weber; Kurt Wolfe
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Rapid experimental measurements of physicochemical properties to inform models and testing.

Authors:  Chantel I Nicolas; Kamel Mansouri; Katherine A Phillips; Christopher M Grulke; Ann M Richard; Antony J Williams; James Rabinowitz; Kristin K Isaacs; Alice Yau; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  A comparison of molecular representations for lipophilicity quantitative structure-property relationships with results from the SAMPL6 logP Prediction Challenge.

Authors:  Raymond Lui; Davy Guan; Slade Matthews
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Comparing and Validating Machine Learning Models for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Thomas Lane; Daniel P Russo; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Alexandru Korotcov; Valery Tkachenko; Robert C Reynolds; Alexander L Perryman; Joel S Freundlich; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Emerging Chlorinated Polyfluorinated Polyether Compounds Impacting the Waters of Southwestern New Jersey Identified by Use of Nontargeted Analysis.

Authors:  James P McCord; Mark J Strynar; John W Washington; Erica L Bergman; Sandra M Goodrow
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2020-12-08

7.  Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Ana C Puhl; Kimberley M Zorn; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Jennifer J Klein; Anthony J Hickey; Alex M Clark
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 43.841

8.  Antibacterial Activity Prediction of Plant Secondary Metabolites Based on a Combined Approach of Graph Clustering and Deep Neural Network.

Authors:  Mohammad Bozlul Karim; Shigehiko Kanaya; Md Altaf-Ul-Amin
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 9.  Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches *.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Sebastian Hoffmann; Nathalie Alépée; David Allen; Takao Ashikaga; Warren Casey; Elodie Clouet; Magalie Cluzel; Bertrand Desprez; Nichola Gellatly; Carsten Göbel; Petra S Kern; Martina Klaric; Jochen Kühnl; Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier; Karsten Mewes; Masaaki Miyazawa; Judy Strickland; Erwin van Vliet; Qingda Zang; Dirk Petersohn
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 10.  Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery.

Authors:  Rohan Gupta; Devesh Srivastava; Mehar Sahu; Swati Tiwari; Rashmi K Ambasta; Pravir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.