Literature DB >> 29729507

Rapid experimental measurements of physicochemical properties to inform models and testing.

Chantel I Nicolas1, Kamel Mansouri1, Katherine A Phillips2, Christopher M Grulke3, Ann M Richard3, Antony J Williams3, James Rabinowitz3, Kristin K Isaacs2, Alice Yau4, John F Wambaugh5.   

Abstract

The structures and physicochemical properties of chemicals are important for determining their potential toxicological effects, toxicokinetics, and route(s) of exposure. These data are needed to prioritize the risk for thousands of environmental chemicals, but experimental values are often lacking. In an attempt to efficiently fill data gaps in physicochemical property information, we generated new data for 200 structurally diverse compounds, which were rigorously selected from the USEPA ToxCast chemical library, and whose structures are available within the Distributed Structure-Searchable Toxicity Database (DSSTox). This pilot study evaluated rapid experimental methods to determine five physicochemical properties, including the log of the octanol:water partition coefficient (known as log(Kow) or logP), vapor pressure, water solubility, Henry's law constant, and the acid dissociation constant (pKa). For most compounds, experiments were successful for at least one property; log(Kow) yielded the largest return (176 values). It was determined that 77 ToxPrint structural features were enriched in chemicals with at least one measurement failure, indicating which features may have played a role in rapid method failures. To gauge consistency with traditional measurement methods, the new measurements were compared with previous measurements (where available). Since quantitative structure-activity/property relationship (QSAR/QSPR) models are used to fill gaps in physicochemical property information, 5 suites of QSPRs were evaluated for their predictive ability and chemical coverage or applicability domain of new experimental measurements. The ability to have accurate measurements of these properties will facilitate better exposure predictions in two ways: 1) direct input of these experimental measurements into exposure models; and 2) construction of QSPRs with a wider applicability domain, as their predicted physicochemical values can be used to parameterize exposure models in the absence of experimental data. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical features; Environmental chemicals; Physicochemical properties; Predictive modeling; QSAR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29729507      PMCID: PMC6214190          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  57 in total

1.  Absorption prediction from physicochemical parameters.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pharm Sci Technolo Today       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  High throughput physicochemical profiling for drug discovery.

Authors:  E H Kerns
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 3.  How not to develop a quantitative structure-activity or structure-property relationship (QSAR/QSPR).

Authors:  J C Dearden; M T D Cronin; K L E Kaiser
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Identifying chemicals that are planetary boundary threats.

Authors:  Matthew MacLeod; Magnus Breitholtz; Ian T Cousins; Cynthia A de Wit; Linn M Persson; Christina Rudén; Michael S McLachlan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Data set modelability by QSAR.

Authors:  Alexander Golbraikh; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  High-throughput dietary exposure predictions for chemical migrants from food contact substances for use in chemical prioritization.

Authors:  Derya Biryol; Chantel I Nicolas; John Wambaugh; Katherine Phillips; Kristin Isaacs
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  The use of pseudo-equilibrium constant affords improved QSAR models of human plasma protein binding.

Authors:  Xiang-Wei Zhu; Alexander Sedykh; Hao Zhu; Shu-Shen Liu; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring.

Authors:  Julia E Rager; Mark J Strynar; Shuang Liang; Rebecca L McMahen; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; John F Wambaugh; Kristin K Isaacs; Richard Judson; Antony J Williams; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  SHEDS-HT: an integrated probabilistic exposure model for prioritizing exposures to chemicals with near-field and dietary sources.

Authors:  Kristin K Isaacs; W Graham Glen; Peter Egeghy; Michael-Rock Goldsmith; Luther Smith; Daniel Vallero; Raina Brooks; Christopher M Grulke; Halûk Özkaynak
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.

Authors:  Mark T D Cronin; Joanna S Jaworska; John D Walker; Michael H I Comber; Christopher D Watts; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

1.  Incorporating human exposure information in a weight of evidence approach to inform design of repeated dose animal studies.

Authors:  Kelly Lowe; Jeffrey Dawson; Katherine Phillips; Jeffrey Minucci; John F Wambaugh; Hua Qian; Tharacad Ramanarayanan; Peter Egeghy; Brandall Ingle; Rachel Brunner; Elizabeth Mendez; Michelle Embry; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integrates in silico approaches.

Authors:  Kevin M Crofton; Arianna Bassan; Mamta Behl; Yaroslav G Chushak; Ellen Fritsche; Jeffery M Gearhart; Mary Sue Marty; Moiz Mumtaz; Manuela Pavan; Patricia Ruiz; Magdalini Sachana; Rajamani Selvam; Timothy J Shafer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Steven T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Dan Wilson; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 3.  Assessing Human Exposure to SVOCs in Materials, Products, and Articles: A Modular Mechanistic Framework.

Authors:  Clara M A Eichler; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Ying Xu; Jianping Cao; Chenyang Bi; Charles J Weschler; Tunga Salthammer; Glenn C Morrison; Antti Joonas Koivisto; Yinping Zhang; Corinne Mandin; Wenjuan Wei; Patrice Blondeau; Dustin Poppendieck; Xiaoyu Liu; Christiaan J E Delmaar; Peter Fantke; Olivier Jolliet; Hyeong-Moo Shin; Miriam L Diamond; Manabu Shiraiwa; Andreas Zuend; Philip K Hopke; Natalie von Goetz; Markku Kulmala; John C Little
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Prediction of Partition Coefficients of Environmental Toxins Using Computational Chemistry Methods.

Authors:  David van der Spoel; Sergio Manzetti; Haiyang Zhang; Andreas Klamt
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-08-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.