Literature DB >> 27992391

Auditory Brainstem Response Altered in Humans With Noise Exposure Despite Normal Outer Hair Cell Function.

Naomi F Bramhall1, Dawn Konrad-Martin, Garnett P McMillan, Susan E Griest.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent animal studies demonstrated that cochlear synaptopathy, a partial loss of inner hair cell-auditory nerve fiber synapses, can occur in response to noise exposure without any permanent auditory threshold shift. In animal models, this synaptopathy is associated with a reduction in the amplitude of wave I of the auditory brainstem response (ABR). The goal of this study was to determine whether higher lifetime noise exposure histories in young people with clinically normal pure-tone thresholds are associated with lower ABR wave I amplitudes.
DESIGN: Twenty-nine young military Veterans and 35 non Veterans (19 to 35 years of age) with normal pure-tone thresholds were assigned to 1 of 4 groups based on their self-reported lifetime noise exposure history and Veteran status. Suprathreshold ABR measurements in response to alternating polarity tone bursts were obtained at 1, 3, 4, and 6 kHz with gold foil tiptrode electrodes placed in the ear canal. Wave I amplitude was calculated from the difference in voltage at the positive peak and the voltage at the following negative trough. Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions were collected in each participant at the same four frequencies to assess outer hair cell function.
RESULTS: After controlling for individual differences in sex and distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude, the groups containing participants with higher reported histories of noise exposure had smaller ABR wave I amplitudes at suprathreshold levels across all four frequencies compared with the groups with less history of noise exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: Suprathreshold ABR wave I amplitudes were reduced in Veterans reporting high levels of military noise exposure and in non Veterans reporting any history of firearm use as compared with Veterans and non Veterans with lower levels of reported noise exposure history. The reduction in ABR wave I amplitude in the groups with higher levels of noise exposure cannot be accounted for by sex or variability in outer hair cell function. This change is similar to the decreased ABR wave I amplitudes observed in animal models of noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy. However, without post mortem examination of the temporal bone, no direct conclusions can be drawn concerning the presence of synaptopathy in the study groups with higher noise exposure histories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27992391      PMCID: PMC5313078          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  29 in total

1.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Aging after noise exposure: acceleration of cochlear synaptopathy in "recovered" ears.

Authors:  Katharine A Fernandez; Penelope W C Jeffers; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Characteristics of the audiometric 4,000 Hz notch (744,553 veterans) and the 3,000, 4,000, and 6,000 Hz notches (539,932 veterans).

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Rachel McArdle
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

4.  Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model.

Authors:  Roland Schaette; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Compound action potentials recorded intracranially from the auditory nerve in man.

Authors:  A R Møller; P J Jannetta
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Primary neural degeneration in the Guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift.

Authors:  Harrison W Lin; Adam C Furman; Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-18

7.  Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Intensity effect on amplitude of auditory brainstem responses in human.

Authors:  Z D Jiang
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1991

9.  Predicting auditory nerve survival using the compound action potential.

Authors:  Brian R Earl; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Mechanisms of hearing loss after blast injury to the ear.

Authors:  Sung-Il Cho; Simon S Gao; Anping Xia; Rosalie Wang; Felipe T Salles; Patrick D Raphael; Homer Abaya; Jacqueline Wachtel; Jongmin Baek; David Jacobs; Matthew N Rasband; John S Oghalai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  58 in total

1.  Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects.

Authors:  Kelsie J Grant; Anita M Mepani; Peizhe Wu; Kenneth E Hancock; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Optimizing Auditory Brainstem Response Acquisition Using Interleaved Frequencies.

Authors:  Brad N Buran; Sean Elkins; J Beth Kempton; Edward V Porsov; John V Brigande; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-09

3.  Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Age Effects on Neural Representation and Perception of Silence Duration Cues in Speech.

Authors:  Lindsey Roque; Casey Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Alexandra R Mai; Jennifer M Simpson; Inyong Choi; Michael G Heinz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Examining physiological and perceptual consequences of noise exposure.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Carissa Allen; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Role of Cognition in Common Measures of Peripheral Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Angela AuBuchon; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 8.  Effectiveness of Auditory Measures for Detecting Hidden Hearing Loss and/or Cochlear Synaptopathy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christi M Barbee; Jessica A James; Jin Hyung Park; Emily M Smith; Carole E Johnson; Shari Clifton; Jeffrey L Danhauer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-06-15

9.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and its Prevention: Current Issues in Mammalian Hearing.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.