Literature DB >> 31026197

Age Effects on Neural Representation and Perception of Silence Duration Cues in Speech.

Lindsey Roque1, Casey Gaskins1, Sandra Gordon-Salant1,2, Matthew J Goupell1,2, Samira Anderson1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose Degraded temporal processing associated with aging may be a contributing factor to older adults' hearing difficulties, especially in adverse listening environments. This degraded processing may affect the ability to distinguish between words based on temporal duration cues. The current study investigates the effects of aging and hearing loss on cortical and subcortical representation of temporal speech components and on the perception of silent interval duration cues in speech. Method Identification functions for the words DISH and DITCH were obtained on a 7-step continuum of silence duration (0-60 ms) prior to the final fricative in participants who are younger with normal hearing (YNH), older with normal hearing (ONH), and older with hearing impairment (OHI). Frequency-following responses and cortical auditory-evoked potentials were recorded to the 2 end points of the continuum. Auditory brainstem responses to clicks were obtained to verify neural integrity and to compare group differences in auditory nerve function. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the peripheral or central factors that contributed to perceptual performance. Results ONH and OHI participants required longer silence durations to identify DITCH than did YNH participants. Frequency-following responses showed reduced phase locking and poorer morphology, and cortical auditory-evoked potentials showed prolonged latencies in ONH and OHI participants compared with YNH participants. No group differences were noted for auditory brainstem response Wave I amplitude or Wave V/I ratio. After accounting for the possible effects of hearing loss, linear regression analysis revealed that both midbrain and cortical processing contributed to the variance in the DISH-DITCH perceptual identification functions. Conclusions These results suggest that age-related deficits in the ability to encode silence duration cues may be a contributing factor in degraded speech perception. In particular, degraded response morphology relates to performance on perceptual tasks based on silence duration contrasts between words.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31026197      PMCID: PMC6802877          DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-ASCC7-18-0076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  74 in total

1.  Age differences in backward masking.

Authors:  S E Gehr; M S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Jessica Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Age-related loss of activity of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  R A Schmiedt; J H Mills; F A Boettcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Laboratory note. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range.

Authors:  G Moushegian; A L Rupert; R D Stillman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-12

6.  Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Monique Pousson; Calli Dugas; Amy Fehrenbach
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Jamal Alsamri; M Sasha John; David Purcell; Sahara George; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Processing of broadband stimuli across A1 layers in young and aged rats.

Authors:  Larry F Hughes; Jeremy G Turner; Jennifer L Parrish; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Wenhe Tu; Hannah Guest; Rebecca E Millman; Karolina Kluk; Samuel Couth; Kevin J Munro; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Loud Music Exposure and Cochlear Synaptopathy in Young Adults: Isolated Auditory Brainstem Response Effects but No Perceptual Consequences.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  10 in total

1.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

2.  Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological measures of pulse-rate discrimination.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell; Ed Smith; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Open-Set Phoneme Recognition Performance With Varied Temporal Cues in Younger and Older Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Bomjun J Kwon; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 4.  Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Nicole Jordan; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Olga Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-06

8.  Peripheral deficits and phase-locking declines in aging adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Rebecca Bieber; Alanna Schloss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Age-Related Temporal Processing Deficits in Word Segments in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Rate Discrimination Training May Partially Restore Temporal Processing Abilities from Age-Related Deficits.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsay DeVries; Edward Smith; Matthew J Goupell; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.