Literature DB >> 32648066

Optimizing Auditory Brainstem Response Acquisition Using Interleaved Frequencies.

Brad N Buran1, Sean Elkins2, J Beth Kempton2, Edward V Porsov2, John V Brigande2, Stephen V David2.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) require averaging responses to hundreds or thousands of repetitions of a stimulus (e.g., tone pip) to obtain a measurable evoked response at the scalp. Fast repetition rates lead to changes in ABR amplitude and latency due to adaptation. To minimize the effect of adaptation, stimulus rates are sometimes as low as 10 to 13.3 stimuli per second, requiring long acquisition times. The trade-off between reducing acquisition time and minimizing the effect of adaptation on ABRs is an especially important consideration for studies of cochlear synaptopathy, which use the amplitude of short latency responses (wave 1) to assess auditory nerve survival. It has been proposed that adaptation during ABR acquisition can be reduced by interleaving tones at different frequencies, rather than testing each frequency serially. With careful ordering of frequencies and levels in the stimulus train, adaptation in the auditory nerve can be minimized, thereby permitting an increase in the rate at which tone bursts are presented. However, widespread adoption of this stimulus design has been hindered by lack of available software. Here, we develop and validate an interleaved stimulus design to optimize the rate of ABR measurement while minimizing adaptation. We implement this method in an open-source data acquisition software tool that permits either serial or interleaved ABR measurements. The open-source software library, psiexperiment, is compatible with widely used ABR hardware. Consistent with previous studies, careful design of an interleaved stimulus train can reduce ABR acquisition time by more than half, with minimal effect on ABR thresholds and wave 1 latency, while improving measures of wave 1 amplitude.

Keywords:  ABR; ABR optimization; auditory brainstem response; tone burst; wave amplitude

Year:  2020        PMID: 32648066      PMCID: PMC7392976          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00754-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  42 in total

1.  Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test.

Authors:  John K Kruschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-07-09

2.  Rapid acquisition of auditory brainstem responses with multiple frequency and intensity tone-bursts.

Authors:  C Mitchell; J B Kempton; T Creedon; D Trune
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Chronic ketamine exposure induces permanent impairment of brain functions in adolescent cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Lin Sun; Qi Li; Qing Li; Yuzhe Zhang; Dexiang Liu; Hong Jiang; Fang Pan; David T Yew
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The auditory brain stem response interaural latency difference (ILD) in patients with brain stem lesions.

Authors:  F E Musiek; G D Johnson; K M Gollegly; A F Josey; M E Glasscock
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Deafness and retinal degeneration in a novel USH1C knock-in mouse model.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; William C Gordon; Hamilton E Farris; Glen H MacDonald; Dale E Cunningham; Carol A Robbins; Bruce L Tempel; Nicolas G Bazan; Edwin W Rubel; Elizabeth C Oesterle; Bronya J Keats
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.964

7.  Risk factors for stereotypic behavior and self-biting in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): animal's history, current environment, and personality.

Authors:  Daniel H Gottlieb; John P Capitanio; Brenda McCowan
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.371

8.  Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. III: Identified cell populations.

Authors:  J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Use of auditory brainstem responses for the early detection of ototoxicity from aminoglycosides or chemotherapeutic drugs.

Authors:  Curtin R Mitchell; Roger M Ellingson; James A Henry; Stephen A Fausti
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2004-05

10.  The Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Melissa J Polonenko; Ross K Maddox
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  4 in total

1.  CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the MYO7A gene in rhesus macaque embryos to generate a primate model of Usher syndrome type 1B.

Authors:  Junghyun Ryu; John P Statz; William Chan; Fernanda C Burch; John V Brigande; Beth Kempton; Edward V Porsov; Lauren Renner; Trevor McGill; Benjamin J Burwitz; Carol B Hanna; Martha Neuringer; Jon D Hennebold
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Auditory evoked potentials: Differences by sex, race, and menstrual cycle and correlations with common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Craig A Champlin; Michelle H Pho; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Efficiency of antioxidant Avenanthramide-C on high-dose methotrexate-induced ototoxicity in mice.

Authors:  Alphonse Umugire; Youngmi Choi; Sungsu Lee; Hyong-Ho Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature.

Authors:  Ewa Domarecka; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcioglu; Ahmet Mutlu; Abdulkadir Özgür; Jasper Smit; Heidi Olze; Agnieszka J Szczepek
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-11-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.