Literature DB >> 27988934

Planning Beyond the Next Trial in Adaptive Experiments: A Dynamic Programming Approach.

Woojae Kim1,2, Mark A Pitt2, Zhong-Lin Lu2, Jay I Myung2.   

Abstract

Experimentation is at the heart of scientific inquiry. In the behavioral and neural sciences, where only a limited number of observations can often be made, it is ideal to design an experiment that leads to the rapid accumulation of information about the phenomenon under study. Adaptive experimentation has the potential to accelerate scientific progress by maximizing inferential gain in such research settings. To date, most adaptive experiments have relied on myopic, one-step-ahead strategies in which the stimulus on each trial is selected to maximize inference on the next trial only. A lingering question in the field has been how much additional benefit would be gained by optimizing beyond the next trial. A range of technical challenges has prevented this important question from being addressed adequately. This study applies dynamic programming (DP), a technique applicable for such full-horizon, "global" optimization, to model-based perceptual threshold estimation, a domain that has been a major beneficiary of adaptive methods. The results provide insight into conditions that will benefit from optimizing beyond the next trial. Implications for the use of adaptive methods in cognitive science are discussed.
Copyright © 2016 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive experiments; Bayesian inference; Cognitive modeling; Dynamic programming; Perceptual threshold measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27988934      PMCID: PMC5474365          DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  22 in total

1.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.

Authors:  S A Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  Adaptive psychophysical procedures, loss functions, and entropy.

Authors:  Elena Kelareva; James Mewing; Andrew Turpin; Anthony Wirth
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Susan A Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Approaches for optimal sequential decision analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  B P Carlin; J B Kadane; A E Gelfand
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Adaptive design optimization: a mutual information-based approach to model discrimination in cognitive science.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt; Janne V Kujala
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Optimally designing games for behavioural research.

Authors:  Anna N Rafferty; Matei Zaharia; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.

Authors:  P E King-Smith; S S Grigsby; A J Vingrys; S C Benes; A Supowit
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functions.

Authors:  J L Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Optimal Decision Stimuli for Risky Choice Experiments: An Adaptive Approach.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Richard Gonzalez; Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  Manage Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.883

10.  A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task.

Authors:  Jerome R Busemeyer; Julie C Stout
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2002-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Adaptive stimulus selection for multi-alternative psychometric functions with lapses.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Bak; Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Bayesian adaptive assessment of the reading function for vision: The qReading method.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Yukai Zhao; Luis Andres Lesmes; Peter Bex; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  A novel Bayesian adaptive method for mapping the visual field.

Authors:  Pengjing Xu; Luis Andres Lesmes; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Computational optimization of associative learning experiments.

Authors:  Filip Melinscak; Dominik R Bach
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.