Literature DB >> 20028226

Adaptive design optimization: a mutual information-based approach to model discrimination in cognitive science.

Daniel R Cavagnaro1, Jay I Myung, Mark A Pitt, Janne V Kujala.   

Abstract

Discriminating among competing statistical models is a pressing issue for many experimentalists in the field of cognitive science. Resolving this issue begins with designing maximally informative experiments. To this end, the problem to be solved in adaptive design optimization is identifying experimental designs under which one can infer the underlying model in the fewest possible steps. When the models under consideration are nonlinear, as is often the case in cognitive science, this problem can be impossible to solve analytically without simplifying assumptions. However, as we show in this letter, a full solution can be found numerically with the help of a Bayesian computational trick derived from the statistics literature, which recasts the problem as a probability density simulation in which the optimal design is the mode of the density. We use a utility function based on mutual information and give three intuitive interpretations of the utility function in terms of Bayesian posterior estimates. As a proof of concept, we offer a simple example application to an experiment on memory retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20028226     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2009.02-09-959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  33 in total

1.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  A Tutorial on Adaptive Design Optimization.

Authors:  Jay I Myung; Daniel R Cavagnaro; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence.

Authors:  Felix D Schönbrodt; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  A sequential Monte Carlo approach to derive sampling times and windows for population pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  J M McGree; C C Drovandi; A N Pettitt
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Luis Lesmes; Li-Xia Feng; Liming Tao; Yi-Feng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Optimally designing games for behavioural research.

Authors:  Anna N Rafferty; Matei Zaharia; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Discriminating Among Probability Weighting Functions Using Adaptive Design Optimization.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Mark A Pitt; Richard Gonzalez; Jay I Myung
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2013-12

8.  A hierarchical adaptive approach to optimal experimental design.

Authors:  Woojae Kim; Mark A Pitt; Zhong-Lin Lu; Mark Steyvers; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  A model-based analysis of decision making under risk in obsessive-compulsive and hoarding disorders.

Authors:  Gabriel J Aranovich; Daniel R Cavagnaro; Mark A Pitt; Jay I Myung; Carol A Mathews
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  The effect of cognitive challenge on delay discounting.

Authors:  Gabriel J Aranovich; Samuel M McClure; Susanna Fryer; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.