Literature DB >> 7240589

Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functions.

J L Hall.   

Abstract

Adaptive psychophysical procedures that have been described in the literature generally fall into one of two categories. (1) Simple procedures, such as UDTR and PEST, can be implemented without an on-line computer. The decision to change testing level is based on the outcome of the few most recent trials, and the final estimate of threshold is given by the final testing level or the average of a few testing levels. (2) "Maximum likelihood" methods require an on-line computer. A parametric form of the psychometric function is assumed, and after each trial a maximum-likelihood estimate of the parameters of the psychometric function is made on the basis of all preceding trials. This estimate is used to set the next testing level and to estimate threshold. We describe here a hybrid procedure, in which testing levels are determined by PEST and the final estimate of threshold is made by fitting an assumed psychometric function to all preceding trials. The PEST rules were tuned to yield results that were accurate and insensitive to errors in initial estimates of the psychometric function. These parameters differ from those that yield optimum results with classical PEST. Results of computer simulations and of experiments with human subjects are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7240589     DOI: 10.1121/1.385912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Estimation of psychometric functions from adaptive tracking procedures.

Authors:  M R Leek; T E Hanna; L Marshall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

2.  Measurement of cone dark adaptation: a comparison of four psychophysical methods.

Authors:  Allannah J Gaffney; Alison M Binns; Tom H Margrain
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The method of constant stimuli is inefficient.

Authors:  A B Watson; A Fitzhugh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01

4.  Vestibular labyrinth contributions to human whole-body motion discrimination.

Authors:  Yulia Valko; Richard F Lewis; Adrian J Priesol; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Extracting thresholds from noisy psychophysical data.

Authors:  W H Swanson; E E Birch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

6.  A computer-controlled system for measuring dark adaptation and other psychophysical functions.

Authors:  C Friedburg; L T Sharpe; S Beuel; E Zrenner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  A MATLAB toolbox for the efficient estimation of the psychometric function using the updated maximum-likelihood adaptive procedure.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Wei Dai; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-03

8.  A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 1. Fitting psychometric functions.

Authors:  Yongwoo Yi; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xinyu D Song; Brittany M Wallace; Jacob R Gardner; Noah M Ledbetter; Kilian Q Weinberger; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.