Literature DB >> 25002821

Optimally designing games for behavioural research.

Anna N Rafferty1, Matei Zaharia1, Thomas L Griffiths2.   

Abstract

Computer games can be motivating and engaging experiences that facilitate learning, leading to their increasing use in education and behavioural experiments. For these applications, it is often important to make inferences about the knowledge and cognitive processes of players based on their behaviour. However, designing games that provide useful behavioural data are a difficult task that typically requires significant trial and error. We address this issue by creating a new formal framework that extends optimal experiment design, used in statistics, to apply to game design. In this framework, we use Markov decision processes to model players' actions within a game, and then make inferences about the parameters of a cognitive model from these actions. Using a variety of concept learning games, we show that in practice, this method can predict which games will result in better estimates of the parameters of interest. The best games require only half as many players to attain the same level of precision.

Keywords:  Markov decision process; cognitive science; computer games; optimal experiment design

Year:  2014        PMID: 25002821      PMCID: PMC4032552          DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2013.0828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-5021            Impact factor:   2.704


  13 in total

1.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning.

Authors:  J Feldman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Bayesian optimal designs for Phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Linda M Haines; Inna Perevozskaya; William F Rosenberger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Cultural route to the emergence of linguistic categories.

Authors:  Andrea Puglisi; Andrea Baronchelli; Vittorio Loreto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Optimization by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Kirkpatrick; C D Gelatt; M P Vecchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Simultaneous versus sequential optimal experiment design for the identification of multi-parameter microbial growth kinetics as a function of temperature.

Authors:  E Van Derlinden; K Bernaerts; J F Van Impe
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Adaptive design optimization: a mutual information-based approach to model discrimination in cognitive science.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt; Janne V Kujala
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

8.  Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of docetaxel in phase II studies in patients with cancer.

Authors:  R Bruno; D Hille; A Riva; N Vivier; W W ten Bokkel Huinnink; A T van Oosterom; S B Kaye; J Verweij; F V Fossella; V Valero; J R Rigas; A D Seidman; B Chevallier; P Fumoleau; H A Burris; P M Ravdin; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Optimal experimental design for model discrimination.

Authors:  Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Action understanding as inverse planning.

Authors:  Chris L Baker; Rebecca Saxe; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Planning Beyond the Next Trial in Adaptive Experiments: A Dynamic Programming Approach.

Authors:  Woojae Kim; Mark A Pitt; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-18

Review 2.  Asking the right questions about the psychology of human inquiry: Nine open challenges.

Authors:  Anna Coenen; Jonathan D Nelson; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

3.  Computational optimization of associative learning experiments.

Authors:  Filip Melinscak; Dominik R Bach
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.