Literature DB >> 2798889

Reduction of sound levels with antinoise in MR imaging.

A M Goldman1, W E Gossman, P C Friedlander.   

Abstract

A combination of active and passive techniques was used to reduce the sound levels in magnetic resonance imagers. These techniques were integrated into an existing audio system. Measurements of sound reduction varied with the protocol being used and averaged 9.9 dB with coaxial cabling and 14.2 dB with fiberoptic conduction of the feedback signal to a controller. Patient comfort and communication were improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2798889     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.173.2.2798889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Acoustic noise reduction in T 1- and proton-density-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Martin Ott; Martin Blaimer; Felix Breuer; David Grodzki; Björn Heismann; Peter Jakob
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  In situ active control of noise in a 4 T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Mingfeng Li; Brent Rudd; Teik C Lim; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Simulation study on active noise control for a 4-T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Mingfeng Li; Teik C Lim; Jing-Huei Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Quiet MR sequences in clinical routine: initial experience in abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; David M Grodzki; Markus Domschke; Moritz Albrecht; Boris Bodelle; Katrin Eichler; Renate Hammerstingl; Thomas J Vogl; Stephan Zangos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Comparison of image quality characteristics on Silent MR versus conventional MR imaging of brain lesions at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Susanne Ohlmann-Knafo; Melanie Morlo; David Laszlo Tarnoki; Adam Domonkos Tarnoki; Barbara Grabowski; Melanie Kaspar; Dirk Pickuth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging noise in standard head and neck sequence does not cause temporary threshold shift in high frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yenn Lynn Lim; Ing Ping Tang; Mohammadreza Peyman; Norlisah Ramli; Prepageran Narayanan; Raman Rajagopalan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Silent BOLD imaging.

Authors:  T Loenneker; F Hennel; U Ludwig; J Hennig
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.