Literature DB >> 11502421

Silent BOLD imaging.

T Loenneker1, F Hennel, U Ludwig, J Hennig.   

Abstract

Pulsed magnetic field gradients in magnetic resonance imaging produce high levels of acoustic noise. In functional magnetic resonance imaging, acoustic scanner noise causes unwanted masking effects. Recently, we proposed a method to perform magnetic resonance imaging experiments undisturbed by acoustic scanner noise by utilizing the property of standard gradient coils to poorly submit acoustic noise in the low frequency range. The silent gradient scheme is now incorporated into a standard T(2)*-weighted sequence. Additionally, simultaneous multi-slice excitation (SIMEX) pulses were implemented to improve the intrinsic low volume coverage of the silent sequence. The proposed silent SIMEX technique was tested and compared with a standard noisy technique using auditory and visual stimulation paradigms. The scanner noise during the silent experiments could be reduced below the range of the ambient noise of the magnet room. This feasibility study shows a trend of decreased activated areas in the noisy experiment for both, the visual and auditory paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11502421     DOI: 10.1007/BF02668155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.533


  22 in total

1.  "Silent" MRI with soft gradient pulses.

Authors:  F Hennel; F Girard; T Loenneker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Chemical shift imaging with phase-encoding RF pulses.

Authors:  J Hennig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Phase-offset multiplanar (POMP) volume imaging: a new technique.

Authors:  G H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages.

Authors:  R W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

5.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient.

Authors:  Z H Cho; S T Chung; J Y Chung; S H Park; J S Kim; C H Moon; I K Hong
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Cortical activation response to acoustic echo planar scanner noise.

Authors:  J L Ulmer; B B Biswal; F Z Yetkin; L P Mark; V P Mathews; R W Prost; L D Estkowski; T L McAuliffe; V M Haughton; D L Daniels
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers.

Authors:  R A Hedeen; W A Edelstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Reduction of sound levels with antinoise in MR imaging.

Authors:  A M Goldman; W E Gossman; P C Friedlander
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Functional burst imaging.

Authors:  P M Jakob; G Schlaug; M Griswold; K O Lovblad; R Thomas; J R Ives; J K Matheson; R R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effect of fMRI acoustic noise on non-auditory working memory task: comparison between continuous and pulsed sound emitting EPI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch; Ernst W Radue; Markus Klarhöfer; Erich Seifritz; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  A real-time data acquisition and control of gradient coil noise for fMRI identification of hearing disorder in children with history of ear infection.

Authors:  Jaeseung Lee; James Holte; E Russell Ritenour
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-02

6.  Neuroimaging paradigms for tonotopic mapping (II): the influence of acquisition protocol.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers; Rosa M Sanchez-Panchuelo; Susan T Francis; Katrin Krumbholz; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  FMRI scanner noise interaction with affective neural processes.

Authors:  Stavros Skouras; Marcus Gray; Hugo Critchley; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.