Literature DB >> 27988412

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes.

Nicole Ilonzo1, Ashley Tsang2, Sara Tsantes2, Alison Estabrook2, Aye Moe Thu Ma2.   

Abstract

The landscape of breast reconstruction has changed significantly. This study assesses trends in type of reconstruction performed after mastectomy and impact on immediate postoperative complications.
METHODS: Data for 67,450 patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer were analyzed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for years 2005-2014. Primary outcomes were wound, nonwound related infections, and bleeding complications. Data were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The percentage of patients that underwent reconstruction after breast cancer increased from 26.94% in 2005 to 43.30% in 2014 (p < 0.01). There was increased wound (5.59%), bleeding (6.82%), and infection (1.80%) complications after flap-based reconstruction (p < 0.01). There was no difference in wound, infection, and bleeding complications between immediate implant reconstruction and tissue expander (TE) at 4.38 vs. 3.89% (p = 0.18), 0.82 vs. 0.7%, p = 0.46), and 0.76 vs. 0.64% (p = 0.45), respectively. Several independent factors were associated with increased wound complications in patients undergoing all or any forms of reconstruction after mastectomy such as being overweight (OR 1.38, CI 1.23-1.55), obese (OR 2.11, CI 1.89-2.35), morbidly obese (OR 3.84, CI 3.34-4.43), ASA Class III (OR 1.35, CI 1.08-1.69), ASA Class IV (OR 1.49, 1.06-2.10), diabetic (OR 1.28 , CI 1.14-1.43), and smokers (OR 1.76, CI 1.59-1.94). TRAM flap was associated with increased risk of wound complication (OR 1.87, CI 1.28-2.75).
CONCLUSION: More women are undergoing reconstruction as utilization of TE increases drastically. Immediate implant placement has only seen moderate increase likely due to surgeon preference.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Mastectomy; Trends

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27988412     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  31 in total

1.  Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Sophocles H Voineskos; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Francesca Tamburelli; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Surveillance and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Oncologic Surgery with Immediate Reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-11

4.  Physical side-effects following breast reconstructive surgery impact physical activity and function.

Authors:  Deirdre E McGhee; Julie R Steele
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Regional Market Competition and the Use of Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ling Chen; Melissa Accordino; Bret Taback; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Effect of contralateral augmentation on postoperative complications after the second stage of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Suhwan Kim; Byung-Joon Jeon; Goo-Hyun Mun; Sa Ik Bang; Jai-Kyong Pyon
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

7.  Concurrent Prophylactic Mastectomy, Immediate Reconstruction, and Salpingo-Oophorectomy in High-Risk Patients: A Case Series.

Authors:  Josephine A D'Abbondanza; Ralph George; Sari Kives; Melinda A Musgrave
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 8.  Breast Reconstruction: Necessity for Further Standardization of the Current Surgical Techniques Attempting to Facilitate Scientific Evaluation and Select Tailored Individualized Procedures Optimizing Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Ekaterini Christina Tampaki; Athanasios Tampakis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004).

Authors:  Feng Xu; Chuqi Lei; Heng Cao; Jun Liu; Jie Li; Hongchuan Jiang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.