Jonas A Nelson1, Sophocles H Voineskos, Ji Qi, Hyungjin M Kim, Jennifer B Hamill, Edwin G Wilkins, Andrea L Pusic. 1. New York, N.Y.; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Boston, Mass. From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, and Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan; and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rates of breast reconstruction following mastectomy continue to increase. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of elective revision surgery and the number of procedures required to achieve a stable breast reconstruction 2 years after mastectomy. METHODS: Women undergoing first-time breast reconstruction after mastectomy were enrolled and followed for 2 years, with completion of reconstruction occurring in 1996. Patients were classified based on the absence or presence of complications. Comparisons within cohorts were performed to determine factors associated with revisions and total procedures. Mixed-effects regression modeling identified factors associated with elective revisions and total operations. RESULTS: Overall, 1534 patients (76.9 percent) had no complications, among whom 40.2 percent underwent elective revisions. The average number of elective revisions differed by modality (p < 0.001), with abdominally based free autologous reconstruction patients undergoing the greatest number of elective revisions (mean, 0.7). The mean total number of procedures also differed (p < 0.001), with tissue expander/implant reconstruction patients undergoing the greatest total number of procedures (mean, 2.4). Complications occurred in 462 patients (23.1 percent), with 67.1 percent of these patients undergoing elective revisions, which was significantly higher than among patients without complications (p < 0.001). The mean number of procedures again differed by modality (p < 0.001) and followed similar trends, but with an increased mean number of revisions and procedures overall. Mixed-effects regression modeling demonstrated that patients experiencing complications had increased odds of undergoing elective revision procedures (OR, 3.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction patients without complications undergo over two procedures on average to achieve satisfactory reconstruction, with 40 percent electing revisions. If a complication occurs, the number of procedures increases. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.
BACKGROUND: Rates of breast reconstruction following mastectomy continue to increase. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of elective revision surgery and the number of procedures required to achieve a stable breast reconstruction 2 years after mastectomy. METHODS:Women undergoing first-time breast reconstruction after mastectomy were enrolled and followed for 2 years, with completion of reconstruction occurring in 1996. Patients were classified based on the absence or presence of complications. Comparisons within cohorts were performed to determine factors associated with revisions and total procedures. Mixed-effects regression modeling identified factors associated with elective revisions and total operations. RESULTS: Overall, 1534 patients (76.9 percent) had no complications, among whom 40.2 percent underwent elective revisions. The average number of elective revisions differed by modality (p < 0.001), with abdominally based free autologous reconstruction patients undergoing the greatest number of elective revisions (mean, 0.7). The mean total number of procedures also differed (p < 0.001), with tissue expander/implant reconstruction patients undergoing the greatest total number of procedures (mean, 2.4). Complications occurred in 462 patients (23.1 percent), with 67.1 percent of these patients undergoing elective revisions, which was significantly higher than among patients without complications (p < 0.001). The mean number of procedures again differed by modality (p < 0.001) and followed similar trends, but with an increased mean number of revisions and procedures overall. Mixed-effects regression modeling demonstrated that patients experiencing complications had increased odds of undergoing elective revision procedures (OR, 3.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction patients without complications undergo over two procedures on average to achieve satisfactory reconstruction, with 40 percent electing revisions. If a complication occurs, the number of procedures increases. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.
Authors: Adelyn L Ho; Esta S Bovill; Sheina A Macadam; Scott Tyldesley; Janice Giang; Peter A Lennox Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Yeliz Cemal; Claudia R Albornoz; Joseph J Disa; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Neil Fine; Edward Buchel; Gayle M Gordillo; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Ji Qi; Claudia Albornoz; Anne F Klassen; Edwin G Wilkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Claudia R Albornoz; Wess A Cohen; Shantanu N Razdan; Babak J Mehrara; Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph J Disa; Joseph H Dayan; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Chen Yan; John P Fischer; Gary M Freedman; Marten N Basta; Stephen J Kovach; Joseph M Serletti; Lilie Lin; Liza C Wu Journal: Breast J Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: John P Fischer; Brady Sieber; Jonas A Nelson; Emily Cleveland; Stephen J Kovach; Liza C Wu; Suhail Kanchwala; Joseph M Serletti Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Dunya Atisha; Amy K Alderman; Julie C Lowery; Latoya E Kuhn; Jenny Davis; Edwin G Wilkins Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: A Lagares-Borrego; P Gacto-Sanchez; P Infante-Cossio; F Barrera-Pulido; D Sicilia-Castro; T Gomez-Cia Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Catherine Pesce; Jennifer Jaffe; Kristine Kuchta; Katharine Yao; Mark Sisco Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Stacey J Jones; Philip Turton; Rajgopal Achuthan; Brian V Hogan; Shireen N Mckenzie; Baek Kim Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-12-17
Authors: Justin M Broyles; Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Wangnan Cao; Monika Reddy Bhuma; Shivani Mehta; Laura S Dominici; Andrea L Pusic; Ian J Saldanha Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-03-11
Authors: Arielle S Radin; Julienne E Bower; Michael R Irwin; Arash Asher; Sara A Hurvitz; Steve W Cole; Catherine M Crespi; Patricia A Ganz Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2022-08-08
Authors: Sebastian Fischer; Yannick F Diehm; Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer; Emre Gazyakan; Christian A Radu; Thomas Kremer; Christoph Hirche; Ulrich Kneser Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 4.241