Literature DB >> 32468133

Physical side-effects following breast reconstructive surgery impact physical activity and function.

Deirdre E McGhee1, Julie R Steele2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence and severity of physical side-effects experienced by women following breast reconstructive surgery and the effect of these side-effects on physical activity and function.
METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-one Australian women (55 years SD 6.5) who had previously had breast reconstruction surgery retrospectively self-reported the incidence and severity of eight physical side-effects and the perceived effect of these side effects on six physical functions, at three time points after their surgery. The frequency of the combined incidence/severity scores and their impact at the three time points were tabulated and compared using Chi-squared tests. A general linear regression was used to identify characteristics associated with moderate-very high (≥ 5/10) combined incidence/severity scores.
RESULTS: At 6 months following surgery, approximately 50% of respondents reported moderate to very high incidence/severity scores for physical side-effects across multiple body regions, which were perceived to limit their physical function and activity levels. The highest incidence/severity scores were associated with the following: (i) pre-existing physical problems before surgery, (ii) post-operative complications (seroma, infection, necrosis), and (iii) autologous rather than implant-based reconstructions.
CONCLUSION: A large percentage of women reported moderate to severe physical side-effects across multiple body regions following breast reconstructive surgery. These side-effects were perceived to negatively impact both physical function and activity. Early intervention, education and treatment are recommended to alleviate these issues and minimise their negative impact.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer, breast reconstruction; Physical side-effects, physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32468133     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05534-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  35 in total

1.  Measuring the patient perspective on latissimus dorsi donor site outcomes following breast reconstruction.

Authors:  John P Browne; Ranjeet Jeevan; Andrea L Pusic; Anne F Klassen; Carmel Gulliver-Clarke; Jerome Pereira; Christopher M Caddy; Stefan J Cano
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Effect of breast reconstruction modality on the development of postmastectomy shoulder morbidity.

Authors:  Kyong-Je Woo; Kyeong-Tae Lee; Goo-Hyun Mun; Jai-Kyong Pyon; Sa Ik Bang
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Neurectomy for breast reconstruction-related spasms of the pectoralis major muscle.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Nathan F Miller; Robert X Murphy
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Toni Zhong; Colleen McCarthy; Sandar Min; Jing Zhang; Brett Beber; Andrea L Pusic; Stefan O P Hofer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  A systematic review of abdominal wall function following abdominal flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Dunya Atisha; Amy K Alderman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Physical and Functional Ability Recovery Patterns and Quality of Life after Immediate Autologous Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: A 1-Year Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Jung Dug Yang; Jin Seok Huh; Yu-Sun Min; Hyo Jin Kim; Ho Yong Park; Tae-Du Jung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  A systematic review of functional donor-site morbidity after latissimus dorsi muscle transfer.

Authors:  Kyeong-Tae Lee; Goo-Hyun Mun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Effect of latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction on the strength profile of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Martine A van Huizum; Marije J Hoornweg; Noor de Ruiter; Erik Oudenhoven; J Joris Hage; Dirk Jan Veeger
Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2016-04-04

9.  Chronic pain following abdominal free flap breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot analysis.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; John P Fischer; Christina Pasick; Priscilla Nelson; Alexander J Chen; Joshua Fosnot; Jesse C Selber; Liza C Wu; Joseph M Serletti
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicole Lindenblatt; Lisanne Gruenherz; Jian Farhadi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness of an Adapted Physical Activity Protocol for Upper Extremity Recovery and Quality of Life Improvement in a Case of Seroma after Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Daniela Mirandola; Francesca Maestrini; Giuditta Carretti; Mirko Manetti; Mirca Marini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  The Application of Inorganic Nanoparticles in Molecular Targeted Cancer Therapy: EGFR Targeting.

Authors:  Meng Sun; Ting Wang; Leijiao Li; Xiangyang Li; Yutong Zhai; Jiantao Zhang; Wenliang Li
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.810

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.