Literature DB >> 33707926

Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004).

Feng Xu1, Chuqi Lei1, Heng Cao1, Jun Liu1, Jie Li1, Hongchuan Jiang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Multi-center data on the current status and trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China are lacking. Herein, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the current clinical practice pattern of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among Chinese female patients with breast cancer.
METHODS: A standardized questionnaire used to collect information on breast reconstruction among females diagnosed with breast cancer was distributed by 31 members of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. Information was collected on tumor characteristics, treatment, mesh application, nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation, postoperative complications, bilateral reconstruction, patient satisfaction and local recurrence. The overall rate of breast reconstruction was assessed, and the characteristics were compared across patient groups with different reconstruction approaches.
RESULTS: A total of 1,554 patients underwent breast reconstruction after total mastectomy, with a reconstruction rate of 9.6%. Among them, 1,190 were implant-based, and 262 underwent autologous reconstructions, while 102 cases underwent a combination of both. Patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction were younger than those who received autologous reconstruction (40.1±4.6 vs. 45.0±5.9, P=0.004). Compared to patients with autologous reconstruction, mesh application (25.5% vs. 6.5%), NAC preservation (51.8% vs. 40.5%) and reconstruction failure (1.8% vs. 0) were more frequently reported among those with implant-based reconstruction. There was no significant difference in general satisfaction across three reconstruction approaches, though patients with autologous reconstruction reported the highest aesthetic satisfaction among the three groups (P=0.044).
CONCLUSIONS: Implant-based breast reconstruction remains the dominant choice among patients, while autologous reconstruction was associated with higher aesthetic satisfaction. Our multi-center investigation based on the findings of the tertiary hospitals of Chinese Society of Breast Surgery may guide a future series of clinical studies on breast reconstruction in China.
Copyright © 2021 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; breast reconstruction; mastectomy; patient satisfaction; questionnaire survey

Year:  2021        PMID: 33707926      PMCID: PMC7941688          DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.01.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res        ISSN: 1000-9604            Impact factor:   5.087


  25 in total

1.  Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases.

Authors:  Max Dieterich; Stefan Paepke; Karin Zwiefel; Holger Dieterich; Jens Blohmer; Andree Faridi; Evelyn Klein; Bernd Gerber; Carolin Nestle-Kraemling
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Comparison of surgical complication between immediate implant and autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A multicenter study of 426 cases.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Haihui Sun; Chao Zhang; Hongchuan Jiang; Shan Guan; Xiang Wang; Bing Wen; Jinfeng Li; Xiru Li; Cuizhi Geng; Jian Yin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  National trends and regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction rates.

Authors:  R Jeevan; J C Mennie; P N Mohanna; J M O'Donoghue; R M Rainsbury; D A Cromwell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Nicole Ilonzo; Ashley Tsang; Sara Tsantes; Alison Estabrook; Aye Moe Thu Ma
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  A retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in direct-to-implant and two-stages prepectoral breast reconstruction: BMI and radiotherapy as new selection criteria of patients.

Authors:  D Casella; G Di Taranto; M G Onesti; M Greco; D Ribuffo
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Long-term follow-up of breast capsule contracture rates in cosmetic and reconstructive cases.

Authors:  Marisa Marques; Spencer A Brown; Isabel Oliveira; M Natália D S Cordeiro; Aliuska Morales-Helguera; Acácio Rodrigues; José Amarante
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Peter B Bach; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Nipple sparing mastectomy: Surgical and oncological outcomes from a national multicentric registry with 913 patients (1006 cases) over a six year period.

Authors:  Lorenzo Orzalesi; Donato Casella; Caterina Santi; Lorenzo Cecconi; Roberto Murgo; Stefano Rinaldi; Lea Regolo; Claudio Amanti; Manuela Roncella; Margherita Serra; Graziano Meneghini; Massimiliano Bortolini; Vittorio Altomare; Carlo Cabula; Francesca Catalano; Alfredo Cirilli; Francesco Caruso; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Luigi Cataliotti; Marco Bernini
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Donald A Hudson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.