Literature DB >> 27956611

Biasing genome-editing events toward precise length deletions with an RNA-guided TevCas9 dual nuclease.

Jason M Wolfs1, Thomas A Hamilton1, Jeremy T Lant1, Marcon Laforet1, Jenny Zhang1, Louisa M Salemi1,2, Gregory B Gloor1, Caroline Schild-Poulter1,2, David R Edgell3.   

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease is commonly used to make gene knockouts. The blunt DNA ends generated by cleavage can be efficiently ligated by the classical nonhomologous end-joining repair pathway (c-NHEJ), regenerating the target site. This repair creates a cycle of cleavage, ligation, and target site regeneration that persists until sufficient modification of the DNA break by alternative NHEJ prevents further Cas9 cutting, generating a heterogeneous population of insertions and deletions typical of gene knockouts. Here, we develop a strategy to escape this cycle and bias events toward defined length deletions by creating an RNA-guided dual active site nuclease that generates two noncompatible DNA breaks at a target site, effectively deleting the majority of the target site such that it cannot be regenerated. The TevCas9 nuclease, a fusion of the I-TevI nuclease domain to Cas9, functions robustly in HEK293 cells and generates 33- to 36-bp deletions at frequencies up to 40%. Deep sequencing revealed minimal processing of TevCas9 products, consistent with protection of the DNA ends from exonucleolytic degradation and repair by the c-NHEJ pathway. Directed evolution experiments identified I-TevI variants with broadened targeting range, making TevCas9 an easy-to-use reagent. Our results highlight how the sequence-tolerant cleavage properties of the I-TevI homing endonuclease can be harnessed to enhance Cas9 applications, circumventing the cleavage and ligation cycle and biasing genome-editing events toward defined length deletions.

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; I-TevI homing endonuclease; NHEJ; genome editing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27956611      PMCID: PMC5206545          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616343114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

1.  Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Chie-Yu Lin; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Silvana Konermann; Alexandro E Trevino; David A Scott; Azusa Inoue; Shogo Matoba; Yi Zhang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways.

Authors:  Emil Mladenov; George Iliakis
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Tapping natural reservoirs of homing endonucleases for targeted gene modification.

Authors:  Ryo Takeuchi; Abigail R Lambert; Amanda Nga-Sze Mak; Kyle Jacoby; Russell J Dickson; Gregory B Gloor; Andrew M Scharenberg; David R Edgell; Barry L Stoddard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genes within genes: multiple LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases target the ribosomal protein S3 gene encoded within an rnl group I intron of Ophiostoma and related taxa.

Authors:  J Sethuraman; A Majer; N C Friedrich; D R Edgell; G Hausner
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Exon coconversion biases accompanying intron homing: battle of the nucleases.

Authors:  J E Mueller; D Smith; M Belfort
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Coupling endonucleases with DNA end-processing enzymes to drive gene disruption.

Authors:  Michael T Certo; Kamila S Gwiazda; Ryan Kuhar; Blythe Sather; Gabrielle Curinga; Tyler Mandt; Michelle Brault; Abigail R Lambert; Sarah K Baxter; Kyle Jacoby; Byoung Y Ryu; Hans-Peter Kiem; Agnes Gouble; Frederic Paques; David J Rawlings; Andrew M Scharenberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Non-homologous DNA increases gene disruption efficiency by altering DNA repair outcomes.

Authors:  C D Richardson; G J Ray; N L Bray; J E Corn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  High frequency targeted mutagenesis using engineered endonucleases and DNA-end processing enzymes.

Authors:  Fabien Delacôte; Christophe Perez; Valérie Guyot; Marianne Duhamel; Christelle Rochon; Nathalie Ollivier; Rachel Macmaster; George H Silva; Frédéric Pâques; Fayza Daboussi; Philippe Duchateau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  megaTALs: a rare-cleaving nuclease architecture for therapeutic genome engineering.

Authors:  Sandrine Boissel; Jordan Jarjour; Alexander Astrakhan; Andrew Adey; Agnès Gouble; Philippe Duchateau; Jay Shendure; Barry L Stoddard; Michael T Certo; David Baker; Andrew M Scharenberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  17 in total

1.  Precise, predictable multi-nucleotide deletions in rice and wheat using APOBEC-Cas9.

Authors:  Shengxing Wang; Yuan Zong; Qiupeng Lin; Huawei Zhang; Zhuangzhuang Chai; Dandan Zhang; Kunling Chen; Jin-Long Qiu; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Functional interrogation of non-coding DNA through CRISPR genome editing.

Authors:  Matthew C Canver; Daniel E Bauer; Stuart H Orkin
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 3.  Naming CRISPR alleles: endonuclease-mediated mutation nomenclature across species.

Authors:  Michelle N Knowlton; Cynthia L Smith
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Delivery of the Cas9 or TevCas9 system into Phaeodactylum tricornutum via conjugation of plasmids from a bacterial donor.

Authors:  Helen Wang; Samuel S Slattery; Bogumil J Karas; David R Edgell
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2018-08-20

5.  Nonlinear manipulation and analysis of large DNA datasets.

Authors:  Meiying Cui; Xueping Zhao; Francesco V Reddavide; Michelle Patino Gaillez; Stephan Heiden; Luca Mannocci; Michael Thompson; Yixin Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 19.160

Review 6.  CRISPR/Cas9 System: A Potential Tool for Genetic Improvement in Floricultural Crops.

Authors:  Ujjwal Sirohi; Mukesh Kumar; Vinukonda Rakesh Sharma; Sachin Teotia; Deepali Singh; Veena Chaudhary; Manoj Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Can Designer Indels Be Tailored by Gene Editing?: Can Indels Be Customized?

Authors:  Sara G Trimidal; Ronald Benjamin; Ji Eun Bae; Mira V Han; Elizabeth Kong; Aaron Singer; Tyler S Williams; Bing Yang; Martin R Schiller
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 8.  Applications of Alternative Nucleases in the Age of CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Tuhin K Guha; David R Edgell
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Increasing the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9-VQR precise genome editing in rice.

Authors:  Xixun Hu; Xiangbing Meng; Qing Liu; Jiayang Li; Kejian Wang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 10.  Programmable Genome Editing Tools and their Regulation for Efficient Genome Engineering.

Authors:  Tuhin Kumar Guha; Alvan Wai; Georg Hausner
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 7.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.