Literature DB >> 28589392

Naming CRISPR alleles: endonuclease-mediated mutation nomenclature across species.

Michelle N Knowlton1, Cynthia L Smith2.   

Abstract

The widespread use of CRISPR/Cas and other targeted endonuclease technologies in many species has led to an explosion in the generation of new mutations and alleles. The ability to generate many different mutations from the same target sequence either by homology-directed repair with a donor sequence or non-homologous end joining-induced insertions and deletions necessitates a means for representing these mutations in literature and databases. Standardized nomenclature can be used to generate unambiguous, concise, and specific symbols to represent mutations and alleles. The research communities of a variety of species using CRISPR/Cas and other endonuclease-mediated mutation technologies have developed different approaches to naming and identifying such alleles and mutations. While some organism-specific research communities have developed allele nomenclature that incorporates the method of generation within the official allele or mutant symbol, others use metadata tags that include method of generation or mutagen. Organism-specific research community databases together with organism-specific nomenclature committees are leading the way in providing standardized nomenclature and metadata to facilitate the integration of data from alleles and mutations generated using CRISPR/Cas and other targeted endonucleases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28589392      PMCID: PMC5569137          DOI: 10.1007/s00335-017-9698-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  108 in total

1.  Guidelines for human gene nomenclature.

Authors:  Hester M Wain; Elspeth A Bruford; Ruth C Lovering; Michael J Lush; Mathew W Wright; Sue Povey
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  Germline modification of domestic animals.

Authors:  L Tang; R González; I Dobrinski
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.807

3.  Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Qiwei Shan; Yanpeng Wang; Jun Li; Yi Zhang; Kunling Chen; Zhen Liang; Kang Zhang; Jinxing Liu; Jianzhong Jeff Xi; Jin-Long Qiu; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Advanced technologies for genetically manipulating the silkworm Bombyx mori, a model Lepidopteran insect.

Authors:  Hanfu Xu; David A O'Brochta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  TALE nickase-mediated SP110 knockin endows cattle with increased resistance to tuberculosis.

Authors:  Haibo Wu; Yongsheng Wang; Yan Zhang; Mingqi Yang; Jiaxing Lv; Jun Liu; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nuclear gene targeting in Chlamydomonas using engineered zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Irina Sizova; Andre Greiner; Mayanka Awasthi; Suneel Kateriya; Peter Hegemann
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  The Rat Genome Database 2015: genomic, phenotypic and environmental variations and disease.

Authors:  Mary Shimoyama; Jeff De Pons; G Thomas Hayman; Stanley J F Laulederkind; Weisong Liu; Rajni Nigam; Victoria Petri; Jennifer R Smith; Marek Tutaj; Shur-Jen Wang; Elizabeth Worthey; Melinda Dwinell; Howard Jacob
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 19.160

8.  Efficient precise knockin with a double cut HDR donor after CRISPR/Cas9-mediated double-stranded DNA cleavage.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Zhang; Xiao-Lan Li; Guo-Hua Li; Wanqiu Chen; Cameron Arakaki; Gary D Botimer; David Baylink; Lu Zhang; Wei Wen; Ya-Wen Fu; Jing Xu; Noah Chun; Weiping Yuan; Tao Cheng; Xiao-Bing Zhang
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Townsend; David A Wright; Ronnie J Winfrey; Fengli Fu; Morgan L Maeder; J Keith Joung; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Chicken Gene Nomenclature Committee report.

Authors:  David W Burt; Wilfrid Carrë; Mark Fell; Andy S Law; Parker B Antin; Donna R Maglott; Janet A Weber; Carl J Schmidt; Shane C Burgess; Fiona M McCarthy
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Navigating Xenbase: An Integrated Xenopus Genomics and Gene Expression Database.

Authors:  Christina James-Zorn; Virgilio Ponferrada; Malcolm E Fisher; Kevin Burns; Joshua Fortriede; Erik Segerdell; Kamran Karimi; Vaneet Lotay; Dong Zhuo Wang; Stanley Chu; Troy Pells; Ying Wang; Peter D Vize; Aaron Zorn
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

2.  The UCSF Mouse Inventory Database Application, an Open Source Web App for Sharing Mutant Mice Within a Research Community.

Authors:  Estelle Wall; Jonathan Scoles; Adriane Joo; Ophir Klein; Carlo Quinonez; Jeffrey O Bush; Gail R Martin; Diana J Laird
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Screening and validation of genome-edited animals.

Authors:  Rosie K Bunton-Stasyshyn; Gemma F Codner; Lydia Teboul
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.471

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.