Literature DB >> 21329706

Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways.

Emil Mladenov1, George Iliakis.   

Abstract

A defining characteristic of damage induced in the DNA by ionizing radiation (IR) is its clustered character that leads to the formation of complex lesions challenging the cellular repair mechanisms. The most widely investigated such complex lesion is the DNA double strand break (DSB). DSBs undermine chromatin stability and challenge the repair machinery because an intact template strand is lacking to assist restoration of integrity and sequence in the DNA molecule. Therefore, cells have evolved a sophisticated machinery to detect DSBs and coordinate a response on the basis of inputs from various sources. A central function of cellular responses to DSBs is the coordination of DSB repair. Two conceptually different mechanisms can in principle remove DSBs from the genome of cells of higher eukaryotes. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) uses as template a homologous DNA molecule and is therefore error-free; it functions preferentially in the S and G2 phases. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), on the other hand, simply restores DNA integrity by joining the two ends, is error prone as sequence is only fortuitously preserved and active throughout the cell cycle. The basis of DSB repair pathway choice remains unknown, but cells of higher eukaryotes appear programmed to utilize preferentially NHEJ. Recent work suggests that when the canonical DNA-PK dependent pathway of NHEJ (D-NHEJ), becomes compromised an alternative NHEJ pathway and not HRR substitutes in a quasi-backup function (B-NHEJ). Here, we outline aspects of DSB induction by IR and review the mechanisms of their processing in cells of higher eukaryotes. We place particular emphasis on backup pathways of NHEJ and summarize their increasing significance in various cellular processes, as well as their potential contribution to carcinogenesis. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21329706     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  165 in total

Review 1.  The role of PARP1 in the DNA damage response and its application in tumor therapy.

Authors:  Zhifeng Wang; Fengli Wang; Tieshan Tang; Caixia Guo
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Role of the translationally controlled tumor protein in DNA damage sensing and repair.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Sonia M de Toledo; Badri N Pandey; Guozheng Guo; Debkumar Pain; Hong Li; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  DNA transcription and repair: a confluence.

Authors:  Robb E Moses; Bert W O'Malley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Robust chromosomal DNA repair via alternative end-joining in the absence of X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1).

Authors:  Cristian Boboila; Valentyn Oksenych; Monica Gostissa; Jing H Wang; Shan Zha; Yu Zhang; Hua Chai; Cheng-Sheng Lee; Mila Jankovic; Liz-Marie Albertorio Saez; Michel C Nussenzweig; Peter J McKinnon; Frederick W Alt; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  DNA-PK: a dynamic enzyme in a versatile DSB repair pathway.

Authors:  Anthony J Davis; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-27

6.  RAG2's acidic hinge restricts repair-pathway choice and promotes genomic stability.

Authors:  Marc A Coussens; Rebecca L Wendland; Ludovic Deriano; Cory R Lindsay; Suzzette M Arnal; David B Roth
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Ronin influences the DNA damage response in pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Bryce A Seifert; Marion Dejosez; Thomas P Zwaka
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.020

Review 8.  Non-homologous end joining: emerging themes and unanswered questions.

Authors:  Sarvan Kumar Radhakrishnan; Nicholas Jette; Susan P Lees-Miller
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-02-26

9.  DNA end resection is needed for the repair of complex lesions in G1-phase human cells.

Authors:  Nicole B Averbeck; Oliver Ringel; Maren Herrlitz; Burkhard Jakob; Marco Durante; Gisela Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Possible involvement of LKB1-AMPK signaling in non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  A Ui; H Ogiwara; S Nakajima; S Kanno; R Watanabe; M Harata; H Okayama; C C Harris; J Yokota; A Yasui; T Kohno
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.