Literature DB >> 31693213

Can Designer Indels Be Tailored by Gene Editing?: Can Indels Be Customized?

Sara G Trimidal1,2, Ronald Benjamin1,2, Ji Eun Bae1,2, Mira V Han1,2, Elizabeth Kong1,2, Aaron Singer1,2, Tyler S Williams1,2, Bing Yang3, Martin R Schiller1,2.   

Abstract

Genome editing with engineered nucleases (GEENs) introduce site-specific DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and repairs DSBs via nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathways that eventually create indels (insertions/deletions) in a genome. Whether the features of indels resulting from gene editing could be customized is asked. A review of the literature reveals how gene editing technologies via NHEJ pathways impact gene editing. The survey consolidates a body of literature that suggests that the type (insertion, deletion, and complex) and the approximate length of indel edits can be somewhat customized with different GEENs and by manipulating the expression of key NHEJ genes. Structural data suggest that binding of GEENs to DNA may interfere with binding of key components of DNA repair complexes, favoring either classical- or alternative-NHEJ. The hypotheses have some limitations, but if validated, will enable scientists to better control indel makeup, holding promise for basic science and clinical applications of gene editing. Also see the video abstract here https://youtu.be/vTkJtUsLi3w.
© 2019 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; TALEN; double strand break; gene editing; meganuclease; non-homologous end joining; zinc finger nuclease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31693213      PMCID: PMC7202862          DOI: 10.1002/bies.201900126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  99 in total

1.  Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair.

Authors:  J R Walker; R A Corpina; J Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The role of BRCA1 in non-homologous end-joining.

Authors:  Da-Tian Bau; Yi-Chien Mau; Chen-Yang Shen
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 3.  DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells.

Authors:  Teruaki Iyama; David M Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-05-16

Review 4.  The genome editing revolution: A CRISPR-Cas TALE off-target story.

Authors:  Stefano Stella; Guillermo Montoya
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Dynamics of Indel Profiles Induced by Various CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Michael Kosicki; Sandeep S Rajan; Flaminia C Lorenzetti; Hans H Wandall; Yoshiki Narimatsu; Emmanouil Metzakopian; Eric P Bennett
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 6.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Meta-analysis of indels causing human genetic disease: mechanisms of mutagenesis and the role of local DNA sequence complexity.

Authors:  Nadia A Chuzhanova; Emmanuel J Anassis; Edward V Ball; Michael Krawczak; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  The zinc-finger domains of PARP1 cooperate to recognize DNA strand breaks.

Authors:  Ammar A E Ali; Gyula Timinszky; Raquel Arribas-Bosacoma; Marek Kozlowski; Paul O Hassa; Markus Hassler; Andreas G Ladurner; Laurence H Pearl; Antony W Oliver
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 9.  Gene therapy for PIDs: progress, pitfalls and prospects.

Authors:  Sayandip Mukherjee; Adrian J Thrasher
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Systematic discovery of complex insertions and deletions in human cancers.

Authors:  Kai Ye; Jiayin Wang; Reyka Jayasinghe; Eric-Wubbo Lameijer; Joshua F McMichael; Jie Ning; Michael D McLellan; Mingchao Xie; Song Cao; Venkata Yellapantula; Kuan-lin Huang; Adam Scott; Steven Foltz; Beifang Niu; Kimberly J Johnson; Matthijs Moed; P Eline Slagboom; Feng Chen; Michael C Wendl; Li Ding
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 53.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.