Literature DB >> 27940538

Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.

Danielle D Cloutier1, Sandra L McLellan2.   

Abstract

Alternative indicators have been developed that can be used to identify host sources of fecal pollution, yet little is known about how their distribution and fate compare to traditional indicators. Escherichia coli and enterococci were widely distributed at the six beaches studied and were detected in almost 95% of water samples (n = 422) and 100% of sand samples (n = 400). Berm sand contained the largest amount of E. coli (P < 0.01), whereas levels of enterococci were highest in the backshore (P < 0.01). E. coli and enterococci were the lowest in water, using a weight-to-volume comparison. The gull-associated Catellicoccus marimammalium (Gull2) marker was found in over 80% of water samples, regardless of E. coli levels, and in 25% of sand samples. Human-associated Bacteroides (HB) and Lachnospiraceae (Lachno2) were detected in only 2.4% of water samples collected under baseflow and post-rain conditions but produced a robust signal after a combined sewage overflow, despite low E. coli concentrations. Burdens of E. coli and enterococci in water and sand were disproportionately high in relation to alternative indicators when comparing environmental samples to source material. In microcosm studies, Gull2, HB, and Lachno2 quantitative PCR (qPCR) signals were reduced twice as quickly as those from E. coli and enterococci and approximately 20% faster than signals from culturable E. coli High concentrations of alternative indicators in source material illustrated their high sensitivity for the identification of fecal sources; however, differential survival and the potential for long-term persistence of traditional fecal indicators complicate the use of alternative indicator data to account for the levels of E. coli and enterococci in environmental samples. IMPORTANCE: E. coli and enterococci are general indicators of fecal pollution and may persist in beach sand, making their use problematic for many applications. This study demonstrates that gull fecal pollution is widespread at Great Lakes beaches, whereas human and ruminant contamination is evident only after major rain events. An exploration of sand as a reservoir for indicators found that E. coli was ubiquitous, while gull host markers were detected in only 25% of samples. In situ sand beach microcosms provided decay rate constants for E. coli and enterococci relative to alternative indicators, which establish comparative benchmarks that would be helpful to distinguish recent from past pollution. Overall, alternative indicators are useful for identifying sources and assessing potentially high health risk contamination events; however, beach managers should be cautious in attempting to directly link their detection to the levels of E. coli or enterococci.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beaches; gull-associated indicators; human-associated indicators; qPCR; water quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27940538      PMCID: PMC5288815          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02881-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  59 in total

1.  Performance of human fecal anaerobe-associated PCR-based assays in a multi-laboratory method evaluation study.

Authors:  Blythe A Layton; Yiping Cao; Darcy L Ebentier; Kaitlyn Hanley; Elisenda Ballesté; João Brandão; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Reagan Converse; Andreas H Farnleitner; Jennifer Gentry-Shields; Maribeth L Gidley; Michèle Gourmelon; Chang Soo Lee; Jiyoung Lee; Solen Lozach; Tania Madi; Wim G Meijer; Rachel Noble; Lindsay Peed; Georg H Reischer; Raquel Rodrigues; Joan B Rose; Alexander Schriewer; Chris Sinigalliano; Sangeetha Srinivasan; Jill Stewart; Laurie C Van De Werfhorst; Dan Wang; Richard Whitman; Stefan Wuertz; Jenny Jay; Patricia A Holden; Alexandria B Boehm; Orin Shanks; John F Griffith
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Growth of enterococci in unaltered, unseeded beach sands subjected to tidal wetting.

Authors:  Kevan M Yamahara; Sarah P Walters; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influence of Land Use, Nutrients, and Geography on Microbial Communities and Fecal Indicator Abundance at Lake Michigan Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Elizabeth W Alm; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Microbes in Beach Sands: Integrating Environment, Ecology and Public Health.

Authors:  Richard Whitman; Valerie J Harwood; Thomas A Edge; Meredith Nevers; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Kannappan Vijayavel; João Brandão; Michael J Sadowsky; Elizabeth Wheeler Alm; Allan Crowe; Donna Ferguson; Zhongfu Ge; Elizabeth Halliday; Julie Kinzelman; Greg Kleinheinz; Kasia Przybyla-Kelly; Christopher Staley; Zachery Staley; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 8.044

5.  Chicken- and duck-associated Bacteroides-Prevotella genetic markers for detecting fecal contamination in environmental water.

Authors:  Ayano Kobayashi; Daisuke Sano; Jun Hatori; Satoshi Ishii; Satoshi Okabe
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Escherichia coli concentrations in feces of geese, coots, and gulls residing on recreational water in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Bastiaan G Meerburg; Miriam G J Koene; David Kleijn
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  Quantitative real-time PCR assays for sensitive detection of Canada goose-specific fecal pollution in water sources.

Authors:  B Fremaux; T Boa; C K Yost
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic Groups.

Authors:  Jenny C Fisher; A Murat Eren; Hyatt C Green; Orin C Shanks; Hilary G Morrison; Joseph H Vineis; Mitchell L Sogin; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Phylogenetic diversity and molecular detection of bacteria in gull feces.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Regina Lamendella; Thomas Edge; Stephen Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Design and evaluation of Bacteroides DNA probes for the specific detection of human fecal pollution.

Authors:  C A Kreader
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  7 in total

1.  Advancements in mitigating interference in quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for microbial water quality monitoring.

Authors:  Sharon P Nappier; Audrey Ichida; Kirsten Jaglo; Rich Haugland; Kaedra R Jones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Selective survival of Escherichia coli phylotypes in freshwater beach sand.

Authors:  Natalie A Rumball; HannahRose C Mayer; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and associated genetic markers from wastewater treatment plant effluents in freshwater microcosms.

Authors:  Eunice C Chern; Larry Wymer; Kristen Brenner; Kevin Oshima; Richard A Haugland
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Occurrence, antifungal susceptibility, and virulence factors of opportunistic yeasts isolated from Brazilian beaches.

Authors:  Natália Op Maciel; Susana Johann; Luciana R Brandão; Sona Kucharíková; Camila G Morais; Alexandre P Oliveira; Gustavo Jc Freitas; Beatriz M Borelli; Franciane M Pellizzari; Daniel A Santos; Patrick Van Dijck; Carlos A Rosa
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.743

5.  Human Fecal Contamination Corresponds to Changes in the Freshwater Bacterial Communities of a Large River Basin.

Authors:  Jill S McClary-Gutierrez; Zac Driscoll; Cheryl Nenn; Ryan J Newton
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-09-08

6.  Microbial Source Tracking Approach to Investigate Fecal Waste at the Strawberry Creek Watershed and Clam Beach, California, USA.

Authors:  Jeremy A Corrigan; Steven R Butkus; Michael E Ferris; Jill C Roberts
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  High levels of sewage contamination released from urban areas after storm events: A quantitative survey with sewage specific bacterial indicators.

Authors:  Hayley T Olds; Steven R Corsi; Deborah K Dila; Katherine M Halmo; Melinda J Bootsma; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 11.069

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.