Literature DB >> 30939326

Advancements in mitigating interference in quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for microbial water quality monitoring.

Sharon P Nappier1, Audrey Ichida2, Kirsten Jaglo2, Rich Haugland3, Kaedra R Jones2.   

Abstract

The United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)1 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria included an Enterococcus spp. quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method as a supplemental indicator-method. In 2012, performance of qPCR for beach monitoring remained limited, specifically with addressing interference. A systematic literature search of peer-reviewed publications was conducted to identify where Enterococcus spp. and E. coli qPCR methods have been applied in ambient waters. In the present study, we evaluated interference rates, contributing factors resulting in increased interference in these methods, and method improvements that reduced interference. Information on qPCR methods of interest and interference controls were reported in 16 papers for Enterococcus spp. and 13 papers for E. coli. Of the Enterococcus spp. qPCR methods assessed in this effort, the lowest frequencies of interference were reported in samples using Method 1609. Low frequencies of sample interference were also reported EPA's modified E. coli qPCR method, which incorporates the same reagents and interference controls as Method 1609. The literature indicates that more work is needed to demonstrate the utility of E. coli qPCR for widespread beach monitoring purposes, whereas more broad use of Method 1609 for Enterococcus spp. is appropriate when the required and suggested controls are employed.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E. coli; Enterococcus; Recreational water

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30939326      PMCID: PMC6555561          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  40 in total

1.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments.

Authors:  Stephen A Bustin; Vladimir Benes; Jeremy A Garson; Jan Hellemans; Jim Huggett; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Factors affecting the relationship between quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and culture-based enumeration of Enterococcus in environmental waters.

Authors:  M R Raith; D L Ebentier; Y Cao; J F Griffith; S B Weisberg
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Droplet digital PCR for simultaneous quantification of general and human-associated fecal indicators for water quality assessment.

Authors:  Yiping Cao; Meredith R Raith; John F Griffith
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Advancements in mitigating interference in quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for microbial water quality monitoring.

Authors:  Sharon P Nappier; Audrey Ichida; Kirsten Jaglo; Rich Haugland; Kaedra R Jones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Effect of platform, reference material, and quantification model on enumeration of Enterococcus by quantitative PCR methods.

Authors:  Yiping Cao; Mano Sivaganesan; Julie Kinzelman; A Denene Blackwood; Rachel T Noble; Richard A Haugland; John F Griffith; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  The digital MIQE guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments.

Authors:  Jim F Huggett; Carole A Foy; Vladimir Benes; Kerry Emslie; Jeremy A Garson; Ross Haynes; Jan Hellemans; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold D Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer; Stephen A Bustin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Standardization of enterococci density estimates by EPA qPCR methods and comparison of beach action value exceedances in river waters with culture methods.

Authors:  Richard A Haugland; Shawn D Siefring; Manju Varma; Alfred P Dufour; Kristen P Brenner; Timothy J Wade; Elizabeth Sams; Stacey Cochran; Steve Braun; Mano Sivaganensan
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.363

8.  Determination of low-density Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori suspensions in water.

Authors:  Yanyan Zhang; Lela K Riley; Mengshi Lin; Zhiqiang Hu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Rapid monitoring of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. in bathing water using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.

Authors:  P Bergeron; H Oujati; V Catalán Cuenca; J M Huguet Mestre; S Courtois
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 5.840

10.  Dramatic improvements in beach water quality following gull removal.

Authors:  Reagan R Converse; Julie L Kinzelman; Elizabeth A Sams; Edward Hudgens; Alfred P Dufour; Hodon Ryu; Jorge W Santo-Domingo; Catherine A Kelty; Orin C Shanks; Shawn D Siefring; Richard A Haugland; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  3 in total

1.  Advancements in mitigating interference in quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for microbial water quality monitoring.

Authors:  Sharon P Nappier; Audrey Ichida; Kirsten Jaglo; Rich Haugland; Kaedra R Jones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Large-scale comparison of E. coli levels determined by culture and a qPCR method (EPA Draft Method C) in Michigan towards the implementation of rapid, multi-site beach testing.

Authors:  Richard Haugland; Kevin Oshima; Mano Sivaganesan; Alfred Dufour; Manju Varma; Shawn Siefring; Sharon Nappier; Brian Schnitker; Shannon Briggs
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  New Detection Platform for Screening Bacteria in Liquid Samples.

Authors:  Rita La Spina; Diana C António; Radoslaw Bombera; Teresa Lettieri; Anne-Sophie Lequarré; Pascal Colpo; Andrea Valsesia
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.