Literature DB >> 23053113

Chicken- and duck-associated Bacteroides-Prevotella genetic markers for detecting fecal contamination in environmental water.

Ayano Kobayashi1, Daisuke Sano, Jun Hatori, Satoshi Ishii, Satoshi Okabe.   

Abstract

Bacteroides-Prevotella group is one of the most promising targets for detecting fecal contamination in water environments, principally due to its host-specific distributions and high concentrations in feces of warm-blooded animals. We developed real-time PCR assays for quantifying chicken/duck-, chicken-, and duck-associated Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers (Chicken/Duck-Bac, Chicken-Bac, and Duck-Bac). A reference collection of DNA extracts from 143 individual fecal samples and wastewater treatment plant influent was tested by the newly established markers. The quantification limits of Chicken/Duck-Bac, Chicken-Bac, and Duck-Bac markers in environmental water were 54, 57, and 12 copies/reaction, respectively. It was possible to detect possible fecal contaminations from wild ducks in environmental water with the constructed genetic marker assays, even though the density of total coliforms in the identical water samples was below the detection limit. Chicken/Duck-Bac marker was amplified from feces of wild duck and chicken with the positive ratio of 96 and 61 %, respectively, and no cross-reaction was observed for the other animal feces. Chicken-Bac marker was detected from 70 % of chicken feces, while detected from 39 % of cow feces, 8.3 % of pig feces, and 12 % of swan feces. Duck-Bac marker was detected from 85 % of wild duck feces and cross-reacted with 31 % of cow feces. These levels of detection specificity are common in avian-associated genetic markers previously proposed, which implies that there is a practical limitation in the independent application of avian-associated Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers and a combination with other fecal contamination markers is preferable for detecting fecal contamination in water environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053113     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-4469-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  16 in total

1.  Application of Faecalibacterium 16S rDNA genetic marker for accurate identification of duck faeces.

Authors:  Da Sun; Chuanren Duan; Yaning Shang; Yunxia Ma; Lili Tan; Jun Zhai; Xu Gao; Jingsong Guo; Guixue Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Simultaneous quantification of multiple food- and waterborne pathogens by use of microfluidic quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Satoshi Ishii; Takahiro Segawa; Satoshi Okabe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Presence of microbial and chemical source tracking markers in roof-harvested rainwater and catchment systems for the detection of fecal contamination.

Authors:  M Waso; T Ndlovu; P H Dobrowsky; S Khan; W Khan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Identifying avian sources of faecal contamination using sterol analysis.

Authors:  Megan L Devane; David Wood; Andrew Chappell; Beth Robson; Jenny Webster-Brown; Brent J Gilpin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  LA35 Poultry Fecal Marker Persistence Is Correlated with That of Indicators and Pathogens in Environmental Waters.

Authors:  Bina Nayak; Jennifer Weidhaas; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.005

7.  Multiparametric monitoring of microbial faecal pollution reveals the dominance of human contamination along the whole Danube River.

Authors:  A K T Kirschner; G H Reischer; S Jakwerth; D Savio; S Ixenmaier; E Toth; R Sommer; R L Mach; R Linke; A Eiler; S Kolarevic; A H Farnleitner
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Quantitative detection of fecal contamination with domestic poultry feces in environments in China.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Zhuang; Hu Li; Xin-Yuan Zhou; Yong-Guan Zhu; Jian-Qiang Su
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Increased water contamination and grow-out Pekin duck mortality when raised with water troughs compared to pin-metered water lines using a United States management system.

Authors:  A Schenk; A L Porter; E Alenciks; K Frazier; A A Best; S M Fraley; G S Fraley
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Evidence of Naturalized Stress-Tolerant Strains of Escherichia coli in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants.

Authors:  Shuai Zhi; Graham Banting; Qiaozhi Li; Thomas A Edge; Edward Topp; Mykola Sokurenko; Candis Scott; Shannon Braithwaite; Norma J Ruecker; Yutaka Yasui; Tim McAllister; Linda Chui; Norman F Neumann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.