Literature DB >> 34855898

Foveal processing of emotion-informative facial features.

Nazire Duran1, Anthony P Atkinson1.   

Abstract

Certain facial features provide useful information for recognition of facial expressions. In two experiments, we investigated whether foveating informative features of briefly presented expressions improves recognition accuracy and whether these features are targeted reflexively when not foveated. Angry, fearful, surprised, and sad or disgusted expressions were presented briefly at locations which would ensure foveation of specific features. Foveating the mouth of fearful, surprised and disgusted expressions improved emotion recognition compared to foveating an eye or cheek or the central brow. Foveating the brow led to equivocal results in anger recognition across the two experiments, which might be due to the different combination of emotions used. There was no consistent evidence suggesting that reflexive first saccades targeted emotion-relevant features; instead, they targeted the closest feature to initial fixation. In a third experiment, angry, fearful, surprised and disgusted expressions were presented for 5 seconds. Duration of task-related fixations in the eyes, brow, nose and mouth regions was modulated by the presented expression. Moreover, longer fixation at the mouth positively correlated with anger and disgust accuracy both when these expressions were freely viewed (Experiment 2b) and when briefly presented at the mouth (Experiment 2a). Finally, an overall preference to fixate the mouth across all expressions correlated positively with anger and disgust accuracy. These findings suggest that foveal processing of informative features is functional/contributory to emotion recognition, but they are not automatically sought out when not foveated, and that facial emotion recognition performance is related to idiosyncratic gaze behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34855898      PMCID: PMC8638924          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  72 in total

1.  Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces.

Authors:  Susan Sullivan; Ted Ruffman; Sam B Hutton
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Featural processing in recognition of emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Olivia Beaudry; Annie Roy-Charland; Melanie Perron; Isabelle Cormier; Roxane Tapp
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-09-18

4.  Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion.

Authors:  P Ekman; W V Friesen; M O'Sullivan; A Chan; I Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis; K Heider; R Krause; W A LeCompte; T Pitcairn; P E Ricci-Bitti
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-10

5.  The eyes are not the window to basic emotions.

Authors:  Caroline Blais; Cynthia Roy; Daniel Fiset; Martin Arguin; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns?

Authors:  S Butler; I D Gilchrist; D M Burt; D I Perrett; E Jones; M Harvey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Xinyue Zhou; Sébastien Miellet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Holistic Processing in the Composite Task Depends on Face Size.

Authors:  David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-06-19

9.  Start position strongly influences fixation patterns during face processing: difficulties with eye movements as a measure of information use.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Dwight J Kravitz; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diagnostic features of emotional expressions are processed preferentially.

Authors:  Elisa Scheller; Christian Büchel; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Older adults have difficulty decoding emotions from the eyes, whereas easterners have difficulty decoding emotion from the mouth.

Authors:  Anna C Y Low; Vincent Y S Oh; Eddie M W Tong; Damian Scarf; Ted Ruffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  The Effects of Separate Facial Areas on Emotion Recognition in Different Adult Age Groups: A Laboratory and a Naturalistic Study.

Authors:  Larissa L Faustmann; Lara Eckhardt; Pauline S Hamann; Mareike Altgassen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Effects of diagnostic regions on facial emotion recognition: The moving window technique.

Authors:  Minhee Kim; Youngwug Cho; So-Yeon Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.