Literature DB >> 33349645

The COVID-19 pandemic masks the way people perceive faces.

Erez Freud1, Andreja Stajduhar2, R Shayna Rosenbaum2,3, Galia Avidan4,5, Tzvi Ganel4.   

Abstract

The unprecedented efforts to minimize the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic introduce a new arena for human face recognition in which faces are partially occluded with masks. Here, we tested the extent to which face masks change the way faces are perceived. To this end, we evaluated face processing abilities for masked and unmasked faces in a large online sample of adult observers (n = 496) using an adapted version of the Cambridge Face Memory Test, a validated measure of face perception abilities in humans. As expected, a substantial decrease in performance was found for masked faces. Importantly, the inclusion of masks also led to a qualitative change in the way masked faces are perceived. In particular, holistic processing, the hallmark of face perception, was disrupted for faces with masks, as suggested by a reduced inversion effect. Similar changes were found whether masks were included during the study or the test phases of the experiment. Together, we provide novel evidence for quantitative and qualitative alterations in the processing of masked faces that could have significant effects on daily activities and social interactions.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33349645      PMCID: PMC7752904          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78986-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  37 in total

1.  The many faces of configural processing.

Authors:  Daphne Maurer; Richard Le Grand; Catherine J. Mondloch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks.

Authors:  F Gosselin; P G Schyns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Females excel at basic face perception.

Authors:  Ryan McBain; Dan Norton; Yue Chen
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-01-20

4.  Parts and wholes in face recognition.

Authors:  J W Tanaka; M J Farah
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1993-05

5.  Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Galia Avidan; Michal Tanzer; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Thomas Busigny; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Mechanisms of face perception.

Authors:  Doris Y Tsao; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Two fixations suffice in face recognition.

Authors:  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao; Garrison Cottrell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10

10.  Recognizing disguised faces: human and machine evaluation.

Authors:  Tejas Indulal Dhamecha; Richa Singh; Mayank Vatsa; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  36 in total

1.  How sign language expertise can influence the effects of face masks on non-linguistic characteristics.

Authors:  Wee Kiat Lau; Jana Chalupny; Klaudia Grote; Anke Huckauf
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  The influence of familiarity on memory for faces and mask wearing.

Authors:  Diana Kollenda; Benjamin de Haas
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-05-15

3.  The effects of face coverings, own-ethnicity biases, and attitudes on emotion recognition.

Authors:  Holly Cooper; Amrit Brar; Hazel Beyaztas; Ben J Jennings; Rachel J Bennetts
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-02

4.  Mask wearing affects emotion perception.

Authors:  Carmel A Levitan; Isabelle Rusk; Danielle Jonas-Delson; Hanyun Lou; Lennon Kuzniar; Gray Davidson; Aleksandra Sherman
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2022-06-26

Review 5.  The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review.

Authors:  Richard Leung; Margaret M Cook; Mike F Capra; Kelly R Johnstone
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.851

6.  Unattractive faces are more attractive when the bottom-half is masked, an effect that reverses when the top-half is concealed.

Authors:  Farid Pazhoohi; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-01-24

7.  Masked face recognition in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Müge Kuzu Kumcu; Sabiha Tezcan Aydemir; Büşra Ölmez; Nazlı Durmaz Çelik; Canan Yücesan
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.830

8.  Are estimates of faces' ages less accurate when they wear sunglasses or face masks and do these disguises make it harder to later recognise the faces when undisguised?

Authors:  Craig Thorley; Benjamin Acton; Jesse Armstrong; Shanade Ford; Margaret Gundry
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-02-16

9.  Face masks versus sunglasses: limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traits.

Authors:  Rachel J Bennetts; Poppy Johnson Humphrey; Paulina Zielinska; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-02-16

10.  Face Masks Bolsters the Characteristics From Looking at a Face Even When Facial Expressions Are Impaired.

Authors:  Wee Kiat Lau
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.