Literature DB >> 32339122

A review of computational approaches for evaluation of rehabilitation exercises.

Yalin Liao1, Aleksandar Vakanski2, Min Xian1, David Paul3, Russell Baker3.   

Abstract

Recent advances in data analytics and computer-aided diagnostics stimulate the vision of patient-centric precision healthcare, where treatment plans are customized based on the health records and needs of every patient. In physical rehabilitation, the progress in machine learning and the advent of affordable and reliable motion capture sensors have been conducive to the development of approaches for automated assessment of patient performance and progress toward functional recovery. The presented study reviews computational approaches for evaluating patient performance in rehabilitation programs using motion capture systems. Such approaches will play an important role in supplementing traditional rehabilitation assessment performed by trained clinicians, and in assisting patients participating in home-based rehabilitation. The reviewed computational methods for exercise evaluation are grouped into three main categories: discrete movement score, rule-based, and template-based approaches. The review places an emphasis on the application of machine learning methods for movement evaluation in rehabilitation. Related work in the literature on data representation, feature engineering, movement segmentation, and scoring functions is presented. The study also reviews existing sensors for capturing rehabilitation movements and provides an informative listing of pertinent benchmark datasets. The significance of this paper is in being the first to provide a comprehensive review of computational methods for evaluation of patient performance in rehabilitation programs. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motion capture sensors; Movement evaluation methods; Physical rehabilitation; Rehabilitation datasets

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32339122      PMCID: PMC7189627          DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  94 in total

1.  Development and preliminary validation of an interactive remote physical therapy system.

Authors:  Anup K Mishra; Marjorie Skubic; Carmen Abbott
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

2.  A new portable device for assessing locomotor performance.

Authors:  M L'Hermette; X Savatier; L Baudry; C Tourny-Chollet; F Dujardin
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  An experimental protocol for the definition of upper limb anatomical frames on children using magneto-inertial sensors.

Authors:  L Ricci; D Formica; E Tamilia; F Taffoni; L Sparaci; O Capirci; E Guglielmelli
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

4.  Accuracy evaluation of the Kinect v2 sensor during dynamic movements in a rehabilitation scenario.

Authors:  M Capecci; M G Ceravolo; F Ferracuti; S Iarlori; S Longhi; L Romeo; S N Russi; F Verdini
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

5.  Criterion validity and between-day reliability of an inertial-sensor-based trunk postural stability test during unstable sitting.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Hakim Mecheri; Ali Shahvarpour; Denis Gagnon; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 6.  Stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Peter Langhorne; Julie Bernhardt; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Quantification of human movement for assessment in automated exercise coaching.

Authors:  Stuart Hagler; Holly B Jimison; Ruzena Bajcsy; Misha Pavel
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

8.  Kinect-based rehabilitation exercises system: therapist involved approach.

Authors:  Li Yao; Hui Xu; Andong Li
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.300

9.  Hierarchical Aligned Cluster Analysis for Temporal Clustering of Human Motion.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Fernando De la Torre; Jessica K Hodgins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.226

10.  Is Pain Intensity Really That Important to Assess in Chronic Pain Patients? A Study Based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP).

Authors:  Maria Bromley Milton; Björn Börsbo; Graciela Rovner; Asa Lundgren-Nilsson; Katharina Stibrant-Sunnerhagen; Björn Gerdle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Body Tracking-Based Low-Cost Solution for Monitoring Workers' Hygiene Best Practices during Pandemics.

Authors:  Vito M Manghisi; Michele Fiorentino; Antonio Boccaccio; Michele Gattullo; Giuseppe L Cascella; Nicola Toschi; Antonio Pietroiusti; Antonio E Uva
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Quality of knee strengthening exercises performed at home deteriorates after one week.

Authors:  Ulrike H Mitchell; Hyunwook Lee; Hayden E Dennis; Matthew K Seeley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Upper Limb Physical Rehabilitation Using Serious Videogames and Motion Capture Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Catherine Alarcón-Aldana; Mauro Callejas-Cuervo; Antonio Padilha Lanari Bo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Out-of-Distribution Detection of Human Activity Recognition with Smartwatch Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Philip Boyer; David Burns; Cari Whyne
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.